
Revised Graham-Cassidy Bill Appears Short of Votes
Collins cited projections for large cuts to Medicaid in explaining her opposition to the proposal.
The Graham-Cassidy Senate plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) appeared to have few paths to passage before the deadline to use a budget maneuver that needs only 50 votes, after
In a prepared statement, she said, “Expert projections show that more than $1 trillion would be taken out of the Medicaid program between the years 2020 and 2036. This would have a devastating impact to a program that has been on the books for 50 years and provides healthcare to our most vulnerable citizens, including disabled children and low-income seniors.”
Collins’ announcement came after a day in which Capitol Hill police hauled people with disabilities out of a hearing on the bill and an analysis from Avalere Health on the latest version of the bill found it would reduce
The Avalere analysis came hours after the Congressional Budget Office scrambled to offer a statement on the updated version of Graham-Cassidy, giving this assessment: “Funding would shift away from states that expanded eligibility for Medicaid under the ACA and toward states that did not.” An analysis of the
Since President Donald Trump took office in January, Republicans in Congress have tried to use the budget resolution process to replace the ACA with just 50 Senate votes, plus a tiebreaker from Vice President Mike Pence. This would avoid the need for 60 votes to break a Senate filibuster. But a budget resolution to fund the government is needed by this weekend, before the new fiscal year begins October 1, 2017.
Collins joins Republicans Rand Paul of Kentucky and John McCain of Arizona in opposing the bill; as of noon, when the Senate Republicans were set to have their weekly Tuesday lunch, there was no word whether Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski would oppose the bill as she had a previous version. Paul had offered a list of demands to change his vote, but these would be unlikely to win back support from Murkowski. Reports indicated Senate leaders had attempted to
In
McCain, meanwhile, has opposed the bill because he wants the Senate to follow “regular order” by having committee hearings and seeking a bipartisan fix to the problems with the ACA. Senators Lamar Alexander, R-Tennessee, and Patty Murray, D-Washington, have been doing this through the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, but that process was suspended when leaders pressed for passage of the Graham-Cassidy plan before the September 30 deadline.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.