Surviving the Patient Satisfaction Survey
Patient satisfaction is often claimed as a surrogate for healthcare quality. This is an incorrect and dishonest assertion and threatens to destroy the doctor-patient relationship at its most sacred juncture—the bedside.
Patient satisfaction is often claimed as a surrogate for healthcare quality. This is an incorrect and dishonest assertion and threatens to destroy the doctor-patient relationship at its most sacred juncture—the bedside.
In the early 2000s the federal government discovered a new metric, patient satisfaction, and mandated hospitals to begin measuring and reporting satisfaction survey results. A generous interpretation is that the CMS mandate is a misguided attempt to guarantee quality in the healthcare for which they were paying.
The cynical view is that the patient satisfaction mandate is an indirect way for the feds to reduce payment. In 2012, CMS began to tie satisfaction survey results to Medicare reimbursement;
Link to the article on Medpage Today:
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.
Related Articles
- Metabolic Issues More Common in Patients With HIV
September 18th 2025
- Barriers to Gender-Affirming Surgery Persist Despite High Satisfaction Rate
September 18th 2025
- Eating Behaviors May Predict GLP-1 Therapy Success in Type 2 Diabetes
September 18th 2025