Implications for using SGLT2 inhibitors as treatment for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, regardless of whether they have diabetes based on DAPA-HF, a practice-changing study.
Transcript
Darren K. McGuire, MD, MHSc: In the wake of the Type 2 diabetes trials proving the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, both on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease outcomes and heart failure outcomes, the field raced to get into a broader space testing these drugs in heart failure. The DAPA-HF trial was the first that had been presented. There’s a similar trial ongoing with empagliflozin. These trials have enrolled patients with reduced-ejection fraction heart failure, independent of their diabetes status. In a great stroke of luck in DAPA-HF, it was roughly a fifty-fifty split. About half the patients had diabetes, and about half the patients did not have diabetes.
Everyone entering the trial had reduced-ejection fraction heart failure, and they were randomized, on top of outstanding evidence-based heart failure therapies, to receive dapagliflozin versus placebo. It was a remarkable superiority benefit both overall for cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure, and for acute presentation with heart failure complications, which was the primary outcome. There was no difference whether the patients had or did not have diabetes.
This is a landmark, revolutionary trial in the heart failure spaces, specifically in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. This now adds to the level 1A–indicated therapies like ACE inhibitors, ARBs, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid antagonists. We now have a brand-new class with robust evidence suggesting incremental benefit added to the best-available therapy up to that time. This is a landmark, practice-changing study, and my colleagues are already embracing this and using SGLT2 inhibitors routinely.
I am going to be thrilled if we get a second trial confirming that this is a class effect. Right now, all we know is that dapagliflozin has this benefit. I look very keenly to the results from the EMPA Acute Heart Failure trial with reduced-ejection fraction to confirm that this may be a class effect and that the use of all these agents may benefit such patients.
Research Points to Potential MCIDs in Diabetes Distress Scale–17
November 29th 2023Researchers identified a value of at least 0.25 to be a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in diabetes distress, and MCID values of 0.38 and 0.39 for emotional and interpersonal distress subscales and physician and regimen distress subscales, respectively.
Read More
How Can Employers Leverage the DPP to Improve Diabetes Rates?
February 15th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Jill Hutt, vice president of member services at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health, explains the Coalition’s efforts to reduce diabetes rates through the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).
Listen
Balancing Care Access and Fragmentation for Better Outcomes in Veterans With Diabetes
April 22nd 2021The authors of a study in the April 2021 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® discuss the possible reasons behind the link between care fragmentation and hospitalizations in veterans with diabetes, as well as potential opportunities to address disjointed care in the context of the widespread telehealth uptake seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen