Currently Viewing:
National Association of ACOs Fall 2018
Currently Reading
Dr Joe Antos: CMS' Proposed MSSP Changes Don't Account for Variability in Healthcare
October 04, 2018
Tying Social Determinants of ACO Patients With High-Need, High-Cost Care
October 05, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus Highlights Excitement and Anxiety at NAACOS Fall 2018 Meeting
October 06, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Discusses How the Proposed MSSP Changes Impact Decisions Around ACOs
October 08, 2018
Predictability and Simplicity Needed to Help ACOs Take on Risk, Panelists Say at NAACOS
October 08, 2018
Are Commercial Payers Experiencing Success With ACO Partnerships?
October 08, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider on Handling Variability in ACO Contracts
October 10, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls: 2 Years Isn't Enough Time for an ACO to Take on Risk
October 14, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus: Private Payer Engagement in ACOs Is Up
October 15, 2018
Allison Brennan: Trump's Administration Is Encouraging Risk, but Possibly Too Quickly
October 16, 2018
Dr Joe Antos: Proposed MSSP Changes Not a Major Shift in Policy for ACOs
October 18, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Discusses Why More ACOs Might Turn to Medicare Advantage
October 21, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls Outlines His Greatest Challenges and Opportunities of the Proposed MSSP Changes
October 22, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider Highlights How Proposed MSSP Changes Build Stability Into Program
October 27, 2018
Allison Brennan Highlights Areas of Opportunity With Proposed MSSP Changes
October 28, 2018
Dr Rob Fields: Proposed MSSP Changes Likely to Stifle ACO Movement, Increase Consolidation
October 30, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus Discusses Measuring MSSP ACOs Savings
October 31, 2018
Dr Joe Antos: Attention Needs to Be on the Future Sustainability of Medicare
November 03, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider: MSSP Proposed Changes Will Be a Step Back on Path to Value
November 07, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls Discusses What May Change Under the Proposed Pathways to Success
November 10, 2018
Allison Brennan Outlines the Greatest Challenges of the Proposed MSSP Changes
November 11, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Highlights Areas for Continued Innovation With ACOs
November 17, 2018
Dr Joe Antos Dissects the Challenge of Addressing Drug Prices
November 23, 2018
Allison Brennan Discusses Impacts of Certain Proposed Changes to the MSSP
November 24, 2018

Scott Hewitt Highlights Progress in the Shift to Value-Based Contracting

Not only are there more dollars being place in value-based contracts, but the healthcare community is starting to see the benefits of these programs, explained Scott Hewitt, vice president, payment strategy and innovation, UnitedHealthcare.


Not only are there more dollars being place in value-based contracts, but the healthcare community is starting to see the benefits of these programs, explained Scott Hewitt, vice president, payment strategy and innovation, UnitedHealthcare.

Transcript

What has been physician interest in participating in value-based contracts? Are you seeing some skepticism disappear?

One of the things that we’ve been doing, as I’m sure most payers are, is tracking what is our evolution in terms of moving to value-based contracting. In 2012, when United Healthcare first started tracking this information, we had roughly $12 billion in spend tied to value-based contracts. Now 5 years later, 6 years later, we have almost $70 billion tied to value-based contracts and not only do we have more dollars tied to value-based contracts, we’re seeing the evolution move form a preponderance of performance-based contracts—so metrics-specific programs—to more programs that are more focused on bundled payments and population health.

So, I think that the provider community, the entire healthcare landscape, is changing to the point where we are seeing the benefits of these programs. Certainly, with the actions that CMS is taking, actions that UnitedHealthcare is taking, actions that employers and states are asking of UnitedHealthcare to undertake. This is the direction that people want to move, and it’s the direction that people should be moving. I mean there’s no other industry where we simply increase reimbursement to somebody—you and I as employees don’t just automatically get a rate increase or our salaries don’t go up on an annual if we’re not performing at a higher level, right, as an example.

We need to bring in more components where we look at the cost and quality of healthcare and how is it being delivery, how is it being received by the members? Is it making a difference? So, I understand the question in terms of providers saying, “I’ve got all these different programs, all these different metrics that I’m being asked to look at. Is it actually resulting in a benefit for the consumer?” And I would think—I know—that the data at UnitedHealthcare shows that it is.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2018 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up