Currently Viewing:
North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Symposium 2018
Dr Thorvardur Halfdanarson Discusses Lack of Risk Factors, Biomarkers in NETs
December 04, 2018
Dr Thorvardur Halfdanarson: Access Is a Big Management Challenge in NETs
November 20, 2018
Dr Thorvardur Halfdanarson on Diagnostics in NETs
November 08, 2018
Dr Scott Paulson: Role of Somatostatin Analogs, Biomarkers in Treatment of GEP-NETs
November 06, 2018
Dr Heloisa Soares on Barriers to Achieving Positive Outcomes in NETs, What's in Store for the Future
November 01, 2018
Dr Thorvardur Halfdanarson on if He Thinks There's a Future For Immunotherapy in NETs
October 23, 2018
Dr Scott Paulson on Standard of Treatment, Novel Approaches Being Taken in GEP-NETs
October 19, 2018
Dr Heloisa Soares on the Importance of Multidisciplinary Care, Patient Engagement in NETs
October 17, 2018
Research at NANETS Cites Value of Genetic Testing in Neuroendocrine Tumors
October 07, 2018
A Comprehensive Look at Updates, Developments in NETs
October 07, 2018
An Update on Lung NET Guidelines
October 07, 2018
Dr Thorvardur Halfdanarson Outlines New, Exciting Developments in Treatment of NETs
October 07, 2018
Currently Reading
Sequencing of Lanreotide Can Improve Outcomes in Patients With Advanced GEP-NETs
October 06, 2018
Merkel Cell Carcinoma in the United States: Prognostics and Treatment Options
October 06, 2018
Debating Best First-Line Treatment in Well-Differentiated G3 NENs
October 06, 2018
Examining the Benefits of Integrative Oncology, Nutrition in NETs
October 05, 2018
Dr Heloisa Soares Discusses the Roles of Somatostatin Analogs in GEP-NETs
October 05, 2018
Analysis Demonstrates Effectiveness, Patient Satisfaction With Lanreotide in GEP-NETs
October 05, 2018
Measuring Quality of Life Among Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors
October 05, 2018

Sequencing of Lanreotide Can Improve Outcomes in Patients With Advanced GEP-NETs

AJMC Staff
A retrospective analysis of clinical charts across multiple institutions has found that transitioning patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) to receive lanreotide after octreotide can be a potential therapeutic option.
A retrospective analysis of clinical charts across multiple institutions has found that transitioning patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) to receive lanreotide (LAN) after octreotide (OCT) can be a potential therapeutic option.

The results were released during a poster session at the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society annual meeting, held October 4-6 in Seattle, Washington.

Researchers at the various institutions who participated in the study reviewed charts of adult patients with locally advanced GEP-NETs who received ≥90 days OCT monotherapy followed by ≥90 days LAN monotherapy. Patient demographic and clinical data, as well as treatment responses, treatment duration, reason for change of treatment, and clinical progression were gathered. The outcomes of interest were clinically defined progressive disease (CDPD) and clinical progression-free duration (CPFD); these were based on radiological imaging, symptom control, biomarkers, or clinical judgement.

Of the 91 patient charts that were reviewed, about 60% (n = 63) were female, and the average age at diagnosis was 57.7 years (standard deviation [SD], 10.9). A majority of patients had advanced disease when they first presented, either stage IV disease (71%) or liver metastases (71.4%), and most had functional disease at diagnosis (60.4%). Primary tumor sites were the small intestine (63.7%) or pancreas (14.3%).

The analysis helped researchers identify several reasons for the transition to LAN:
  • CDPD (22%)
  • Formulary change (15.4%)
  • Patient preference (9.9%)
While 30.8% of OCT patients had CDPD when they started LAN treatment, the number reduced to 24.2% when patients were evaluated at a median follow-up of 59.5 months (interquartile range, 41.4-94.9). CPFD on LAN (n = 91) was 23.7 months (95% CI, 20.2-NE). For CDPD OCT patients (n = 28) and patients who had stable disease (n = 52), CPFD was 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.4-NE) and 24 months (95% CI, 24.7-NE), respectively.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2018 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!