Currently Viewing:
Contributor
CMS Announces Transformative Updates to the MA VBID Model
February 18, 2019
Review Finds VBID Programs Improved Adherence at No Added Cost
August 01, 2018
Value-Based Insurance Design Highlighted at Two Congressional Hearings
July 02, 2018
CMS Rule Creates More Flexibility for Value-Based Benefits in Medicare Advantage
May 25, 2018
Currently Reading
High-Deductible Health Plans a Problem for Patients With Cancer
May 10, 2018
Legislative Actions Encourage Value in Medicare Advantage and High-Deductible Health Plans
February 23, 2018
Addressing Rising Cost Sharing With Precision Co-Pay Assistance
February 08, 2018
A Year of Value-Based Insurance Design: 2017 Highlights
January 15, 2018
Study Identifies Unexpected Contributor to Rising Health Costs: Low-Cost Services
December 27, 2017
CMS Expands MA VBID Model Test in 2019
December 08, 2017
CMS Proposed Rule Allows Greater Flexibility for VBID in Medicare Advantage
November 25, 2017
Identifying the Top 5 Low-Value Services That Can Be Targeted for Reduction
November 10, 2017
VBID in Action: Connecticut Health Enhancement Plan
March 26, 2017
Healthcare Stakeholders Call for Flexibility in HSA-HDHPs
March 12, 2017
2016 Year in Review: University of Michigan V-BID Center
February 02, 2017
VBID and Medicare Advantage: Achieving Bipartisan Support
November 30, 2016
Understanding Clinical Nuance
October 25, 2016
Implementing VBID in Medicare and Medicare Advantage
October 19, 2016
The Cost of Low-Value Care
October 11, 2016
Adventures in Healthcare: The Dawn of the High-Value Health Plan
October 04, 2016
Reward the Good Soldier: A Dynamic Approach to Consumer Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs
September 26, 2016

High-Deductible Health Plans a Problem for Patients With Cancer

Since its inception in 2005, the University of Michigan Center for Value-Based Insurance Design (V-BID) has led efforts to promote the development, implementation, and evaluation of innovative health benefit designs balancing cost and quality. A multidisciplinary team of faculty, including A. Mark Fendrick, MD and Michael E. Chernew, PhD, who first published and named the VBID concept, have guided this approach from early principles to widespread adoption in the private and public sectors. The Center has played a key role in the inclusion of VBID in national healthcare reform legislation, as well as in numerous state initiatives. The basic VBID premise is to align patients' out-of-pocket costs, such as copayments, with the value obtained from health services and providers.
This article was collaboratively written by A. Mark Fendrick, MD, director of the Center for Value-Based Insurance Design (V-BID), and several V-BID Center staff. 

Receiving a cancer diagnosis can be one of the most terrifying moments of a patient’s life, but for many patients with high-deductible health plans (HDHPs), their fears go beyond the disease itself to concerns about the ability to pay for necessary treatments. For the millions of Americans enrolled in increasingly popular HDHPs, a cancer diagnosis can mean thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs before their health plans even begin to kick in to pay part of the bill. These high deductibles often result in a patient’s decision to delay or forgo care, a decision that can mean life or death for patients with cancer.

Originally designed to engage consumers in choosing lower-cost care options, thereby reducing healthcare spending, studies have shown that HDHPs result in nonspecific reductions in the use of both low- and high-value services. A recent study of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology and featured in The New York Times illustrates this unintended consequence of high-deductibles.

When faced with a possible breast cancer diagnosis, patients with high deductibles were more likely to delay necessary next steps and treatments, such as diagnostic imaging and biopsies, lumpectomies and mastectomies, and chemotherapy. Though the study did not include a longitudinal analysis of the effect of initial delays in treatment on patient outcomes, it is widely acknowledged that prognoses improve with earlier detection and treatment.

Despite concerns over patients’ underuse of necessary services, HDHPs have continued to grow in popularity, with nearly 20 million enrollees and more than half of covered workers in the United States facing a plan deductible of $1000 or more. This popularity has necessitated efforts to mitigate the negative financial and health effects of HDHPs.

The University of Michigan Center for Value-Based Insurance Design (V-BID) has long advocated for the High-Value Health Plan (HVHP), a clinically nuanced alternative to traditional HDHPs. In an HVHP, the IRS “safe harbor” established for predeductible coverage of recommended preventive health services would be expanded to cover certain high-value, clinically-indicated health services prior to meeting the plan deductible. Such an arrangement would provide for improved coverage options without fundamentally altering the original intent and spirit of consumer engagement inherent in HDHPs.

Expanding the IRS “safe harbor” would increase the attractiveness and clinical effectiveness of HDHPs and would better align consumer engagement with provider payment reform initiatives. Adoption of voluntary, clinically-nuanced HVHPs has the potential to mitigate cost-related non-adherence, enhance patient-centered outcomes, allow for premiums lower than most preferred provider organizations and health management organizations, and substantially reduce aggregate healthcare expenditures. The HVHP would provide millions of Americans a plan option that better meets their clinical and financial needs.

For more information, read about HDHPs and the HVHP on the V-BID Center website.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2019 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up