
CMS Clears Oklahoma VBP Plan, but Rejects Massachusetts Formulary Request
Oklahoma’s Medicaid program is the first to win approval from CMS to negotiate supplemental rebate agreements involving value-based purchasing (VBP) arrangements with drug manufacturers, with the aim of producing extra rebates for the state if clinical outcomes are not reached. Separately, CMS denied an application from Massachusetts requesting the ability to exclude certain Medicaid-covered outpatient drugs through a closed formulary.
Oklahoma’s Medicaid program is the first to win approval from CMS to negotiate supplemental rebate agreements (SRAs) involving value-based purchasing (VBP) arrangements with drug manufacturers, with the aim of producing extra rebates for the state if clinical outcomes are not achieved.
“Oklahoma’s plan for value-based drug contracts is an important example of how states can innovate to bring down drug costs,” HHS Secretary Alex Azar said in a statement. Azar, who appeared before the
Oklahoma's Medicaid program is called SoonerCare and covers roughly 800,000 people.
VBP can link the
CMS said almost every state Medicaid plan includes the authority of the state to negotiate SRAs with drug manufacturers that provide rebates at least as large as those set forth in the Medicaid national drug rebate agreement.
Medicaid is paid for with both federal and state funds, so CMS said it reviews all state plan amendments, including SRAs, which are exempt from the Medicaid “best price” rule that requires drug manufacturers to extend the lowest price for a drug they negotiate with any other buyer to all states in the Medicaid program.
Separately, CMS denied an application from Massachusetts requesting the ability to exclude certain Medicaid-covered outpatient drugs through a closed formulary. In
Massachusetts could not continue to keep collecting drug manufacturer rebates under Section 1927 of the Social Security Act while excluding certain drugs from coverage, CMS said.
If a closed formulary was approved, Massachusetts also wanted to obtain a selective network for specialty pharmacy for members in its Primary Care Clinician (PCC) Plan, Primary Care accountable care organization models, and fee-for-service network. CMS would have allowed that, but Massachusetts was only interested in it if the closed formulary was also approved, the CMS letter indicated.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.