News
Article
MATTERHORN offers another case of moving immunotherapy from metastatic to early-stage cancers.
Patients with newly diagnosed gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer who received the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (Imfinzi; AstraZeneca) and chemotherapy both before and after surgery were more likely to be alive and event-free after 2 years than those receiving chemotherapy only, findings released Sunday show.1
The phase 3 MATTERHORN trial (NCT04592913), to be presented at the plenary session of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, shows that following their success in later-stage gastric cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors can work as well or better for patients who are starting cancer treatment. The study is also being published in the New England Journal of Medicine.2
Durvalumab is already approved as a single agent or in combinations to treat hepatocellular carcinoma, advanced biliary tract and muscle-invasive bladder cancers, as well as types of non–small cell and small cell lung cancer. Checkpoint inhibitors, including PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have been used for later-stage gastric cancer for years, and MATTERHORN demonstrated success for immunotherapy in early-stage cancer.
Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD | Image credit: MSKCC
MATTERHORN evaluated use of durvalumab with the chemotherapy combination 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel, or FLOT, which the NEJM authors note is established as perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric or GEJ cancers.
Gastric and GEJ cancer is a worldwide killer and will account for 1.2 million deaths this year, the study’s lead author, Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, said during a press briefing, where she noted the rise of these cancers in patients under age 50.
“We know that immunotherapy works for stage IV disease, in the advanced setting and metastatic disease. We’ve been using PD-1 agents for years now but [immunotherapy] has not been proven to help patients in early-stage cancer,” she said. “So, the MATTERHORN study was designed to address this problem and to demonstrate benefit for patients with localized, nonmetastatic disease going through surgery.”
In this international trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive durvalumab or placebo for 2 cycles along with FLOT, both given intravenously. Followed by surgery between 4 and 8 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Next came 2 more cycles of durvalumab or placebo and FLOT, followed by a 1500-mg dose of durvalumab or placebo, administered intravenously every 4 weeks for another 10 cycles.
The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS) which was the time from randomization until the date of disease progression or death from any cause. Key secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and pathological complete response (pCR).
Patients received baseline scans by CT or MRI within 28 days of randomization. For the adjuvant period, imaging took place 4 weeks after surgery and within 28 days of the start of adjuvant therapy. Imaging was also performed within 4 weeks after the last dose of neoadjuvant FLOT and before surgery. Tumor assessments were performed every 12 weeks for 2 years and then every 24 weeks until progression.
Following enrollment, the randomized population had 948 patients, with 474 receiving durvalumab plus FLOT and 474 receiving placebo plus FLOT. After a median follow-up of 31.5 months, results showed the following:
Janjigian noted that the neoadjuvant treatment did not compromise patients’ ability to have a complete resection, which she said is always a concern for surgeons. She noted that more than half of patients completed an entire year of durvalumab, and the completion rate for FLOT was 61%, which she described as “not bad for this cohort of patients.”
“This will change practice for our patients, which is exciting to see,” she said, despite the fact that “these were not well-behaving cancers,” due to invasive features and lymph node involvement.
In the subgroup analysis, patients did well regardless of geographic location, as this trial involved patients from 20 countries. There were no significant differences based on PD-L1 expression, tumor status at baseline, or whether patients were younger or older than 65 years of age. Men outnumbered women in the trial, and they had 35% reduced risk of progression or death, compared with 16% for women. Patients were stratified by geography as from Asia or other countries, due to the high rates of gastric cancer in Asia. White patients comprised about 67% of the participants, with Asian patients making up 20%; study authors noted that Black patients were underrepresented with just 10 patients (1.1%) across the 2 arms.
Pamela Kunz, MD, director of the Center for Gastrointestinal (GI) Cancers at the Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale, said the MATTERHORN results were the latest good news in treatment of GI cancers. She said the trial answers the question of whether patients can tolerate a multidrug regimen, which is important for this approach to make its way into local practice.
“This study will be practice changing,” Kunz said.
AstraZeneca funded the study.
References