Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (>14 days) for total hip replacement/total knee replacement was associated with significantly lower risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events than short-duration thromboprophylaxis.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) following total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgery imposes significant health and economic burden.
To examine the impact of thromboprophylaxis duration on deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), total VTE (DVT and PE), and bleeding events among THR/TKR patients.
A retrospective study (April 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006) was conducted using a US health plan claims database linked to an inpatient database containing medication use. Outcomes were compared using c2 tests; predictors of outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.
Results: Of 3497 patients, 3195 (91%) received thromboprophylaxis for ≥1 day postsurgery. Most patients (67%) received short-duration (1-14 days) rather than extended-duration (>14 days) thromboprophylaxis. The incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events was higher in those who received short-duration thromboprophylaxis: DVT (2.84% vs 1.24%; P = .0038), PE (1.12% vs 0.19%; P = .0052), total VTE (3.96% vs 1.43%; P <.0001), and major bleeding (1.68% vs 0.38%; P = .0011). Multivariate logistic regressions (adjusted for observed demographic and clinical characteristics) revealed similar results. Baseline comorbidity score was significantly associated with major bleeding; most of the bleeding events in those who received short-duration thromboprophylaxis occurred within the first 14 days.
In this database analysis of patients who had undergone THR/TKR surgery, a large proportion of patients did not receive the minimum duration of thromboprophylaxis recommended by the guidelines. Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower risk of DVT, PE, and VTE compared with short-duration thromboprophylaxis.
(Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(11):857-863)
This study suggests that a large proportion of US patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement do not receive extended-duration (>14 days) thromboprophylaxis therapy as recommended by American College of Chest Physicians guidelines.
Following total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, patients face increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).1-3 The incidence of hospital-acquired VTE is 40% to 60% following major orthopedic surgery.4 Added to that is the risk of PE—some cases of which can be fatal. Because of these serious complications associated with major orthopedic surgery, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommends routine use of thromboprophylaxis in these patients.3 The effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis have been shown in a broad spectrum of patients who have undergone THR or TKR surgery. Thromboprophylaxis reduces the risk of VTE (including fatal PE) by more than 60%, and the risk of clinically relevant bleeding is low and similar to that in patients receiving mechanical prophylaxis or no prophylaxis.1,4,5
According to the international Global Orthopaedic Registry, which collected data from approximately 15,000 patients who underwent THR or TKR, VTE occurred after the median time to hospital discharge in 75% of THR and 57% of TKR patients who experienced this complication. The cumulative incidence of VTE within 3 months was 1.7% after THR and 2.6% after TKR.6 Two meta-analyses compared studies with short-duration6 and long-duration5 thromboprophylaxis, and the results demonstrated that long-duration thromboprophylaxis resulted in a lower rate of VTE than short-duration prophylaxis.5,7
Current evidence-based guidelines recommend extending thromboprophylaxis beyond 10 days and up to 35 days after THR surgery and also suggest extending thromboprophylaxis for up to 35 days after TKR surgery.3 There has been limited evaluation of thromboprophylaxis duration and clinical outcomes in nonclinical trial populations of THR/TKR patients in North America. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of DVT, PE, VTE, and bleeding events in patients receiving short- and extended-duration pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after THR and/or TKR surgery in US clinical practice.
This was a retrospective database analysis conducted to evaluate thromboprophylaxis patterns and outcomes in patients who underwent THR or TKR. Patient information was collected from 2 databases: the “claims database” from an i3 Innovus—affiliated (Eden Prairie, MN) US health plan and an “inpatient database” called Perspective, from Premier, Inc (San Diego, CA). The claims database included healthcare utilization information from the community collected through claims submitted by physicians, hospitals, and pharmacies; it included only limited information on medication use and procedures performed in the hospital during an inpatient stay and on deaths occurring postdischarge. The inpatient database was derived from more than 450 hospitals8 and provided patient demographics, diagnosis, treatments, and medication use (including type of postsurgery thromboprophylaxis). Linkage between the claims database and the inpatient database was conducted in line with the methodology described by Hammill et al.9
Patients and Treatment Assessments
Patients were commercial health plan members, age 18 years or older, who had elective THR or TKR between April 1, 2004, and December 31, 2006. They were enrolled continuously during the baseline (a 90-day period prior to surgery claim date), index hospitalization (presurgery and postsurgery), and follow-up (90-day period after hospital discharge) periods. Patients with evidence of any VTE or orthopedic surgery during the baseline period were excluded. Patient demographics (age, sex, geographic location) were captured from enrollment data in the claims database. See at www.ajmc.com for details on patient enrollment and attrition. Baseline comorbidity was measured for each patient using the Deyo10 adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index.11 This adaptation uses a scale of 0 to 28, representing the sum of individual weighted scores for each comorbid condition.
Patients were categorized into subclasses for thromboprophylaxis duration comparisons (short duration lasting 1-14 days vs extended duration lasting >14 days; 1-21 vs >21 days; and 1-28 vs >28 days). Use of the 14-day cutoff for shortduration thromboprophylaxis was based on previous comparative trials,12,13 as well as the design proposed by Friedman14 and others.15 The 14-day time frame included both in-hospital and posthospital thromboprophylaxis,15 as well as patients who did and did not receive thromboprophylaxis for
the ACCP-recommended minimum 10 days.3
Clinical outcomes included DVT, PE, total VTE (DVT and PE), and bleeding (major or minor) events. Major bleeding included fatal bleeding, nonfatal bleeding at a critical site, bleeding requiring reoperation, or overt bleeding. Fatal bleeding was defined as bleeding events during the postoperative period, with or without a diagnosis code of discharge bleeding, and evidence of death at discharge without stroke or myocardial infarction.16 Bleeding (major or minor) events occurring on the day of surgery were excluded. Mortality was not included (6 [0.27%] in the short-duration (1-14 days) group and 1 [0.1%] in the longer-duration (>14 days) group; P = nonsignificant); the causes of death could not be confirmed.
Thromboprophylaxis duration was compared among subgroups using the c2 test for dichotomous and polychotomous variables and the t test for continuous variables.
Logistic regression was used to assess factors affecting probability of DVT, PE, any VTE, and bleeding events. These regressions controlled for observed baseline characteristics including age, sex, geographic region, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, surgery type (THR or TKR), and duration (1-14 days or >14 days) and type of thromboprophylaxis (oral vs injectable).
Warfarin was the only oral agent used for anticoagulation and considered as thromboprophylaxis, but data also were collected on the use of platelet aggregation inhibitors (clopidogrel, ticlopidine); injectable thromboprophylaxis included low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, and fondaparinux.
Of 30,644 eligible patients, 3497 could be linked to the inpatient database records. Of these patients, 3195 had received anticoagulation (warfarin or other vitamin K antagonist, low molecular weight heparin, fondaparinux, or unfractionated heparin) or antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel or ticlopidine) for at least 1 day postsurgery. Within the sample population of 3195 patients, 67% (n = 2148) received short-duration thromboprophylaxis (1-14 days) and 33% (n = 1047) received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (>14 days). Of the 2148 patients in the short-duration group, 83% (56% of the total sample population) received VTE prophylaxis for fewer than 10 days. Mean Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores for all patients were less than 1 on the scale of 0 to 28, which was not clinically significant.
Of the 3195 patients in the sample population, 35% (n =1123) had THR surgery and 65% (n = 2072) had TKR surgery. Patients in the THR group who received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis were younger, with lower rates of both hypertension and hepatic disease compared with patients who received short-duration thromboprophylaxis. Similarly, patients in the TKR group who received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis were more frequently younger males, with lower rates of prior long-term anticoagulant use ().
Duration of Thromboprophylaxis and Outcomes
Across both THR and TKR groups, patients receiving short-duration thromboprophylaxis were more likely to experience the following events than patients who received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis: DVT (2.84% vs 1.24%; P = .0038) and PE (1.12% vs 0.19%; P = .0052). Total VTE occurred in 85 (3.96%) of 2148 patients who received
short-duration thromboprophylaxis compared with 15 (1.43%) of 1047 patients who received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (P <.0001). Moreover, the rate of VTE decreased with increasing thromboprophylaxis duration (ie, 1.43%, 1.32%, and 0.97% for >14, >21, and >28 days of therapy, respectively; ). Interestingly, there was a lower rate of major bleeding events in patients receiving extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (>14 days) compared with those receiving short-duration prophylaxis (1.68% vs 0.38%; P = .0011). The rate of minor bleeding was not significantly different between short- and extended-duration thromboprophylaxis (Table 2).
Patients in the THR group who received short-duration thromboprophylaxis had a proportionally higher incidence of DVT (2.14% vs 1.60%), PE (0.94% vs 0.27%), or total VTE (3.08% vs 1.86%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 2). However, in the THR group, short-duration thromboprophylaxis was associated with higher rates of both major and minor bleeding events compared with extended-duration thromboprophylaxis. In the TKR group, patients receiving short-duration thromboprophylaxis were more likely to experience DVT (3.21% vs 1.04%; P =.0024), PE (1.21% vs 0.15%; P = .0111), and total VTE (4.43% vs 1.19%; P <. 0001). The major bleeding rate was significantly higher in patients who received short-duration compared with extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in the TKR group (Table 2).
Logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis after surgery had a significantly lower probability of experiencing any VTE ([odds ratio [OR] = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.71; P <.01), DVT (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.90; P <.05), PE (OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.83; P < .05), or major bleeding (OR = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.67; P <.01) following index surgery. The baseline Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score was associated with major bleeding (OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.02,-1.83; P <.05).
Secondary Analysis of Major Bleeding Events
There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients who received short-duration versus extended-duration thromboprophylaxis. See at www.ajmc.com. Of the 40 patients who experienced major bleeding, 36 were in the short-duration group and 4 were in the extended-duration group. Of the 36 patients who received short-duration thromboprophylaxis, 10 experienced major bleeding on day 2 after surgery. Most major bleeding events (20/36, 56%) occurred in the first 2 weeks after surgery and therefore likely influenced the duration of therapy. See at www.ajmc.com. After removing from the analysis the 20 patients who experienced major bleeding during the first 2 weeks, the VTE rate in the short-duration group compared with the extended-duration group was 3.95% versus 1.43% (P <.001).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
This study evaluated the duration of thromboprophylaxis and associated real-world outcomes in US patients who underwent elective THR or TKR. The current ACCP guidelines recommend that thromboprophylaxis be extended beyond 10 days and up to 35 days after THR surgery, and suggest extending thromboprophylaxis for up to 35 days after TKR surgery.3 Despite guideline recommendations and the clinical evidence of the benefit of extended thromboprophylaxis, results from the current study showed that in clinical practice, more than two-thirds of patients in the United States received only short-duration therapy (1-14 days), and among those, 83% (more than half of the total sample population) received VTE prophylaxis for less than 10 days, the minimum recommended thromboprophylaxis duration.
In the current study, a 14-day cutoff for short-term prophylaxis was used, based on previous comparative trials using enoxaparin,12,13 as well as the design proposal by Friedman14
and others.15 This 14-day duration covers both in-hospital and posthospital prophylaxis15 and includes patients who received an ACCP-recommended agent2,3 for less than the minimum of 10 days. Overall, the results showed significantly higher rates of DVT, PE, and total VTE in patients who received short duration thromboprophylaxis (1-14 days) compared with those who received >14 days of thromboprophylaxis. Moreover, the incidence rates were further reduced when thromboprophylaxis was used for >28 days. After adjusting for covariates, multivariate logistic regression revealed similar results. However, when data were analyzed according to the type of surgery, the decrease in VTE events in the extended-duration group did not reach statistical significance in patients undergoing THR, but this is likely due to the smaller number of patients in this group.
Because different bleeding definitions were used in different studies,17 direct comparisons with other clinical studies cannot be made. Nevertheless, both minor and major bleeding rates were lower in this study than in those published previously.15,18,19 The unexpected lower major bleeding rate observed in patients who received extended-duration thromboprophylaxis could not be attributed to the duration of anticoagulant therapy, as more than half of the bleeding events in those who received short-duration thromboprophylaxis occurred within the first 14 days. Bleeding events may have been one of the reasons for the discontinuation of thromboprophylaxis. In addition, logistic regression showed that the baseline Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score was significantly associated with major bleeding.
There are limitations to our study, typical of any retrospective claims data analysis. First, ideal stratification would have been done according to physician-intended duration, but this information was not available. Second, medications filled over-the-counter (eg, aspirin) or provided as samples by the physician were not measurable in the claims data. The impact of race/ethnicity,20 body mass index,21 extent of surgery,22 anesthesia duration,21,23 and other risk factors22,24 on VTE and bleeding events was not available. Finally, the reasons for not continuing thromboprophylaxis therapy were not available and may have been because of higher risk for bleeding, which may have contributed to the higher bleeding rate in the short-duration thromboprophylaxis group.
The results from this analysis suggest that a large proportion of patients undergoing THR or TKR in the United States do not receive the ACCP guideline—recommended duration of thromboprophylaxis therapy. Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis is associated with a lower incidence of DVT, PE, and total VTE.
The authors acknowledge the contributions of individuals to this study. Jonathan Kurlander, MS, an i3 Innovus employee, constructed the analytic data set for this study from health claims. Laura Oberthur Johnson, PhD, i3 consultant, collaborated in writing and manuscript preparation.
Author Affiliations: From the Division of Hematology and Clinical Epidemiology (PSW), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada; University of Ottawa (PSW), Canada; Division of Health Care Policy and Research (BJB), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Johnson & Johnson (NS, DS), Raritan, NJ; Bayer, Inc (HPM), Toronto, Canada; and Orthopaedic Research Program (LMK), Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA.
Funding Source: This research was funded by Johnson & Johnson.
Author Disclosures: Dr Wells reports having received honoraria and payment from Bayer for his involvement in the preparation of the manuscript. He also reports having received honoraria for presentations made for BioMerieux, Dade Behring, Leo Pharma, Organon, and sanofi-aventis. Ms McDonald is employed by Bayer, Inc of Canada and reports owning stock in the company. Dr Kwong reports receiving research grants from Astellas, Bayer, Takeda, and sanofi-aventis, and honoraria as an invited speaker from GlaxoSmithKline. Drs Sengupta and Supina are employees and stockholders of Johnson & Johnson. Dr Sengupta has also received grant monies from Johnson & Johnson. Dr Borah reports no relationship or financial interest with any entity that would pose a conflict of interest with the subject matter of this article.
Authorship Information: Concept and design (PSW, BJB, NS, DS, HPM); acquisition of data (BJB, HPM); analysis and interpretation of data (PSW, BJB, NS, DS, HPM, LMK); drafting of the manuscript (PSW, BJB, NS, DS, HPM, LMK); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (PSW, BJB, NS, DS, HPM, LMK); statistical analysis (BJB, NS, DS); provision of study materials or patients (BJB, NS); obtaining funding (BJB, NS, DS); administrative, technical, or logistic support (BJB); and supervision (BJB).
Address correspondence to: Bijan J. Borah, PhD, i3 Innovus, 12125 Technology Dr, Mail route MN002-0258, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
1. Geerts WH, Heit JA, Clagett GP, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2001;119(1 suppl):132S-175S.
2. Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;126(3 suppl):338S-400S.
3. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al; American College of Chest Physicians. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 8th ed. Chest. 2008;133(6 suppl):381S-453S.
4. Fuji T, Ochi T, Niwa S, Fujita S. Prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in Japanese patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with three dosage regimens of enoxaparin. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13(5):442-451.
5. Eikelboom JW, Quinlan DJ, Douketis JD. Extended-duration prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: a meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;358(9275):9-15.
6. Warwick D, Friedman RJ, Agnelli G, et al. Insufficient duration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip or knee replacement when compared with the time course of thromboembolic events: findings from the Global Orthopaedic Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(6):799-807.
7. Douketis JD, Eikelboom JW, Quinlan DJ, Willan AR, Crowther MA. Short-duration prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: a meta-analysis of prospective studies investigating symptomatic outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(13):1465-1471.
8. Premier Inc. Premier Perspective Web site. 2010. http://www. premier inc.com/quality-safety/tools-services/prs/data/perspective.jsp. Accessed August 6, 2010.
9. Hammill BG, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC, Schulman KA, Curtis LH. Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers. Am Heart J. 2009;157(6):995-1000.
10. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613-619.
11. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383.
12. Lovenox (enoxaparin sodium injection) [prescribing information]. Bridgewater, NJ: sanofi-aventis; 2009. http://products.sanofi-aventis. us/lovenox/lovenox.pdf. Accessed August 6, 2010.
13. Kakkar AK, Brenner B, Dahl OE, et al; RECORD2 Investigators. Extended duration rivaroxaban versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9632): 31-39.
14. Friedman RJ. Optimal duration of prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism following total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(3):148-155.
15. Conduah A, Lieberman JR. Venous thromboembolic prophylaxis after elective total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:274-284.
16. Vera-Llonch M, Hagiwara M, Oster G. Clinical and economic consequences of bleeding following major orthopedic surgery. Thromb Res. 2006;117(5):569-577.
17. Schulman S, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Levine MN; American College of Chest Physicians. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant and thrombolytic treatment: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, 8th ed. Chest. 2008;133 (6 suppl):257S-298S.
18. Brookenthal KR, Freedman KB, Lotke PA, Fitzgerald RH, Lonner JH. A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(3):293-300.
19. Freedman KB, Brookenthal KR, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Williams S, Lonner JH. A meta-analysis of thromboembolic prophylaxis following elective total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A(7):929-938.
20. Keenan CR, White RH. The effects of race/ethnicity and sex on the risk of venous thromboembolism. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2007;13(5):377-383.
21. White RH, Gettner S, Newman JM, Trauner KB, Romano PS. Predictors of rehospitalization for symptomatic venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(24):1758-1764.
22. White RH, Henderson MC. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism after total hip and knee replacement surgery. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2002;8(5):365-371.
23. Jaffer AK, Barsoum WK, Krebs V, Hurbanek JG, Morra N, Brotman DJ. Duration of anesthesia and venous thromboembolism after hip and knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(6):732-738.
24. Keenan CR, White RH. Age as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism after major surgery. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2005;11(5):398-402.