
CMS' ACA Guidance, Oversight Under Scrutiny
Top Congressional Democrats sent a request to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) asking it to determine if guidance issued by CMS in October 2018 in relation to the Section 1332 waivers states can pursue is subject to legislative oversight. Meanwhile, a report said none of the 8 states that have approval to create a work requirement for their Medicaid expansion pool of beneficiaries have plans to track whether enrollees find jobs or improve their health.
Top Congressional Democrats Wednesday sent a request to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) asking it to determine if guidance issued by CMS in October 2018 in relation to the Section 1332 waivers states can pursue is subject to legislative oversight.
Also on Wednesday, The Los Angeles Times reported that
The
- Providing coverage that is at least as comprehensive
- Providing coverage that is at least as affordable
- Providing coverage to at least a comparable number of residents
- Not increasing the federal deficit
Under the new guidance, states are encouraged to use
Two critics of the administration, House Energy and Commerce Chairman Frank Pallone Jr, D-New Jersey, and Senate Finance Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, want to know if October’s move is subject to the Congressional Review Act (CRA). The
Is the guidance issued by CMS a rule?
“The CRA excludes rules of particular applicability, rules relating to agency management or personnel, and rules that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. The 2018 guidance is a statement of general applicability and affects the substantive rights of all states and of their residents enrolled in health insurance coverage under the ACA,” the letter said.
If GAO finds that the 2018 guidance qualifies as a rule, then it could be subject to the CRA, and Congress could theoretically overrule the revised guidance.
Separately, an analysis of federal and state documents by The Los Angeles Times shows that 2012 regulations telling states to estimate effects on coverage before starting a program, and then having an independent program evaluation afterwards to make sure that goals are being met, is not happening. The issue is gaining more attention as Arkansas, the first state to implement work requirements, has reported that thousands of people have lost health coverage for failing to report work requirements.
In a written response to the paper, a CMS spokesperson said the agency does not believe states must do enrollment calculations.
If implemented nationwide, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has said work requirements could cause 1.4 million to 4 million people among the 23.5 million adult Medicaid enrollees who are younger than 65 and not receiving disability benefits to lose their health coverage.
Late last year, in a letter to HHS Secretary Alex Azar, the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.