Article

COA Expresses Concern With Mandatory Radiation Oncology Model

In response to CMS’ announcement outlining the Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model, the Community Oncology Alliance (COA) has expressed concerns over the model being mandatory or “required” by the agency.

In response to CMS’ announcement outlining the Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model, the Community Oncology Alliance has expressed concerns over the model being mandatory or “required” by the agency. While they note that the model does include a much-needed policy proposal to implement site-neutral payment, they do not support mandatory models.

They add that if models are reasonable and advance value-based care, then voluntary provider participation will be robust and that mandatory models can subject patients with cancer and other serious diseases to disruptions in care that they need and are guaranteed and entitled to under Medicare.

Read the full press release.

Related Videos
Lalan Wilfong, MD
Dr Kimlin Tam Ashing
Mike Fazio, Navista, Cardinal Health
Dr Kimlin Tam Ashing
Andrew Kuykendall, MD, Moffitt Cancer Center
John Michael O'Brien, PharmD, MPH
Frederick L Locke, MD, Moffitt
Sam Peasah, PhD, MBA, RPh, director for the Center of High-Value Health Care at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
Erin Weber, MS
Cathy Eng, MD, FACP, FASCO, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Related Content
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo