Combination endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and biological therapy significantly decreased polyp burden in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) compared with biologic therapy alone
Treatment with biologic therapy in combination with surgery for patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) may improve outcomes in polyp burden, according to research published in the International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology.
For patients with CRSwNP, biologic therapy has proved to be a useful treatment. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) has also been effective for delivering medication and removing inflammatory tissue; however, previous studies demonstrate that biologic therapy offers lasting anti-inflammatory results, reduces polyp burden, and can even delay the timing of ESS. While previous studies have examined the impacts of biologic therapy on its own, Garvey et al. set out to investigate the joint effectiveness of biologic therapy with ESS compared to sole use of biologics.
This was a retroactive study where researchers looked at data from patients with CRSwNP who had ESS while receiving dupilumab or mepolizumab (the ESS-biologic cohort) compared with patients only receiving biologic therapy (the biologic-only cohort). Data were examined from 2018-2021 and included patients who received their diagnosis of CRSwNP from a rhinologist at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.
The main outcomes analyzed included (SNOT-22) scores and total polyp scores. Polyp scores were measured on a scare of 1-4 as such: 0 = no polyps; 1 = polyps confined to the middle meatus; 2 = multiple polyps occupying middle meatus; 3 = polyps extending beyond middle meatus; 4 = polyps completely obstructing nasal cavity. The SNOT-22 is an assessment of patient quality of life, featuring a series of questions regarding nasal, sleep, function, ear/face, and emotional problems that are scored from 0 (indicating there is no problem) to 5 (indicating that the problem is the worst it can be).
A total of 16 patients made up the ESS-biologic cohort (13 received dupilumab and 3 received mepolizumab) and 16 patients made up the biologic-only cohort. The groups did not have any statistically significant differences in aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease status, indication, polyp scores, or baseline SNOT-22 scores.
Patients had ESS an average of 33 days after the onset of biologic therapy and were followed for 12 months. After this time period, both cohorts showed significant reductions in their total polyp scores. The ESS-biologic cohort had a total polyp score decrease from 4.73 to 0.01, whereas the biologic-only cohort’s total polyp score decreased from 5.22 to 3.8 (95% CI of difference, -5.37 to -1.38; Cohen’s d, 2.40; P = .005). The ESS-biologic cohort had a SNOT-22 score of 56.2 at enrollment vs 29.71 at 12 months (95% CI of difference, 12.04-43.71; Cohen’s d, 1.47; P = .004).
In the subanalysis of the ESS-dupilumab cohort, these patients displayed a significant drop in polyp burden from 4.85 to 0.00, compared with the biologic-only control group’s drop from 4.88 to 3.50 (95% CI of difference, -5.68 to -1.32; Cohen’s d, -1.69; P = .009). The biologic-only cohort showed no significant improvements in objective or subjective measures of symptoms.
The authors named their small sample size as the most impactful limitation they encountered. Missing data from various cases contributed to their limited cohort size, and they believed this hinderance influenced the difficulties they had with multiple variables reaching statistical significance.
The findings showed that a combination of ESS with biologic therapy can greatly reduce the polyp burden patients experience compared to treating with biologic therapy alone. The researchers mention that patients in the ESS-biologic cohort also experienced the most improvement in subjective symptoms, but these results did not reach statistically significant markers. Considering this outcome, researchers state that further studies are necessary to fully understand the impact that ESS combined with biologic therapy has for patients with CRSwNP.
Reference
Garvey E, Naimi B, Duffy A, et al. Optimizing the timing of biologic and surgical therapy for patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. Published online July 28, 2023. doi:10.1002/alr.23246
Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes of Patients With Plaque Psoriasis on Tapinarof Cream
December 5th 2023Two posters presented at the 2023 Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference examined patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in patients with plaque psoriasis treated with tapinerof cream.
Read More
Understanding the Unmet Need for Therapies to Treat Rare Bile Duct Cancer
May 24th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we bring you an excerpt of an interview with a co-chair of the 2022 Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation (CCF) annual conference, held earlier this year, about the significant unmet therapy needs facing most patients with this rare cancer.
Listen
Imetelstat Offers Benefits for Patients With MDS Who Are Red Blood Cell–Transfusion Dependent
December 5th 2023The past year has offered new hope for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Besides imetelstat, which has an FDA deadline for action of June 2024, the agency approved luspatercept, which has a different mechanism of action.
Read More