A team of experts from the United States and Canada performed this systematic review, considering for the first time patient values and preferences for their atopic dermatitis (AD) care.
Clinical care, future research, and practice guidelines from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters may be informed by 6 themes that focus on patient values and preferences for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment, following a new systematic analysis from a team of American and Canadian experts in the space.
High-, moderate-, and low-certainty evidence was considered in their systematic review of 62 studies covering 19,442 participants, found following reviews of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception through March 20, 2022; the studies could be of any design and in any language. Most (n = 23; not including the United Kingdom) took place in Europe and were cross-sectional in nature (n = 28), and they all occurred between 1998 and 2021. The largest survey covered 3093 patients and the smallest, 9 patients. The findings were recently published online in JAMA Dermatology.
“These values and preferences can inform AD care,” the study authors wrote. “Systematic summaries of evidence addressing patient values and preferences have not previously been available.”
A strong patient-clinician relationship and improved treatment adherence (n = 24 studies; low-certainty evidence) was the most common theme identified, and it encompassed treatment demonstrations and instructions and strong verbal and written communication. All of these, the study researchers emphasized, can facilitate treatment adherence.
The second most common theme was fear and concern about adverse effects (n = 14 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), with the involved patients and their caregivers stressing their priority of wanting to balance the benefits of prescribed treatments with concerns about long-term chronic use. In particular, topical corticosteroids were cited for skin thinning stemming from continuous use.
A third theme identified was preferring treatments that minimally affect quality of life and activities of daily living (n = 12 studies; low-certainty evidence), and this itself contained the subthemes of effects on social interactions, ease/frequency of application, and treatment route—all of which circle back to the burden imposed by topical treatments. Psychological, mental, and emotional well-being were highlighted as suffering within this theme and its subdivisions.
Examples included having to make tough decisions of not seeing friends because you need to apply cream to control flares or, as was noted by pediatric patient caregivers, their children having to endure great treatment burden with topical therapies; they wished for age-appropriate treatments that would be easier to administer (ie, a spray instead of having to carry tubes of creams). Another hope is for oral or injectable medications that do not require a daily dosing schedule, because these are less-invasive modes of delivery, according to the study participants.
Treatment preference to use topical corticosteroids for the shortest time allowable and then to control eczema flares was the fourth theme identified (n = 11 studies; low-certainty evidence). The participants underscored their wanting a treatment course that initiates when their disease is poorly controlled and that concludes when eczematous lesions are resolved. Some noted this was because topical corticosteroids can actually aggravate the AD if used incorrectly.
Relief from itching or burning skin sensations (n = 9 studies; low-certainty evidence) was the fifth identified theme, with patients noting they understand immediate clear-up of flares is not possible, but they would like immediate relief from eczema’s accompanying itching and burning.
The sixth theme identified was initiating treatment with nonprescription methods (n = 6 studies; high-certainty evidence). With this preference, the study authors noted that patients expressed a “lower risk of adverse effects associated with nonprescription medications as compared with a perception of greater efficacy of prescription medications.” However, patients also still expressed wanting to step up therapy according to disease flares.
The investigators of this review stressed their desire for these 6 themes to inform eczema care moving forward, noting the concerns of patients and their caregivers related to treatment and its effects on daily living and quality of life, as well their wanting to trust the care plan laid out by their health care providers.
“Our findings of the need for information surrounding the practical issues related to treatments, such as applying topicals, are also consistent with the experience of patients with conditions such as cardiovascular disease and chronic pain,” they wrote. “Future studies should clearly report whether patient values and preferences are affected by AD severity. Together, the residual uncertainty regarding these treatments encourages individualized patient care through shared decision-making.”
Reference
Maleki-Yazdi KA, Heen AF, Zhao IX, et al. Values and preferences of patients and caregivers regarding treatment of atopic dermatitis (eczema): a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. Published online January 25, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6045
Real-World Study Reveals Key Insights into DLBCL Treatment Patterns, Outcomes
April 18th 2024A recent study offers valuable insights into the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients across different lines of therapy, providing a look into the landscape of DLBCL management.
Read More
Navigating Health Literacy, Social Determinants, and Discrimination in National Health Plans
February 13th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the February 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on how health plans can screen for health literacy, social determinants of health, and perceived health care discrimination.
Listen
Pegcetacoplan for PNH More Cost-Effective Than Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies
April 18th 2024A cost-utility analysis conducted from the perspective of the Italian health system found that pegcetacoplan was more effective and less costly than 2 complement 5 (C5) inhibitors for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
Read More
Drs Raymond Thertulien, Joseph Mikhael on Racial Disparities in Multiple Myeloma Care Access
December 28th 2023In the wake of the 2023 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition, Raymond Thertulien, MD, PhD, of Novant Health, and Joseph Mikhael, MD, MEd, FRCPC, FACP, chief medical officer of the International Myeloma Foundation, discussed health equity research highlights from the meeting and drivers of racial disparities in multiple myeloma outcomes.
Listen
Gene and Cell Therapies Hold Potential—but How Can Payers Manage Their Costs?
April 18th 2024Presenters at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy (AMCP) 2024 annual meeting discussed the current promise and future potential of gene and cell therapies, as well as payer management strategies for these costly treatments.
Read More
Commonwealth Fund Report Details Pervasive Racial and Ethnic Disparities in US Health Care, Outcomes
April 18th 2024Using 25 health system performance indicators, the Commonwealth Fund 2024 State Health Disparities Report evaluated racial and ethnic disparities in health care and health outcomes both within and across US states and highlighted the urgent need for equitable health care policies and practices in the US.
Read More