The commercial market got slightly less competitive while the Medicare Advantage market got a little more competitive, but both markets remain highly concentrated.
Concentration of health insurance markets in the United States is high and increasing, according to a new report from the American Medical Association (AMA). While concentration in the Medicare Advantage (MA) market decreased slightly, it still remains highly concentrated. On the commercial side, the market got more concentrated from 2014 to 2022.
Higher market concentration, which tends to occur as a result of mergers and acquisitions, often means low competition, which can raise antitrust concerns. In the 2023 edition of Competition in Health Insurance: A Comprehensive Study of U.S. Markets, AMA highlighted the negative consequences of market concentration, mostly in the form of higher premiums.
“Conceptually, mergers and acquisitions can have beneficial and/or harmful effects on consumers,” the AMA noted in its report. “However, only the latter has been observed.”
The report analyzed 381 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs), all 50 states, and the District of Columbia to evaluate the level of competition in health insurance markets. To understand market concentration, the report utilized the Horizontal Merger Guidelines from the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index.
According to the report, 73% of MSA-level commercial markets, 71% of MSA-level MA markets, and 90% of MSA-level public health exchange markets were highly concentrated. While the MA and public health exchange markets had seen a slight decrease from in market concentration from 2014, the commercial market had increased from 71% in 2014.
One health insurer had a market share of least 50% in 48% of the commercial MSAs, 31% of the MA MSAs, and 67% of the public health exchange MSAs.
“High market concentration tends to lower competition among health insurers, which can harm patients by raising insurance premiums above competitive levels,” said AMA President Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, MD, MPH. “The share of markets that are highly concentrated may be far higher than reflected under current federal guidelines. The AMA supports draft federal guidelines that would lower the regulatory threshold for markets to be considered highly concentrated. To reverse the trend toward health insurance consolidation, the AMA strongly supports the proposal as the proper prescription to scrutinize and potentially limit harmful insurance mergers.”
From 2014 to 2022, commercial market shares have largely stayed the same with the top 4 insurers maintaining their rankings at the national level. According to AMA, the national level results “mask the findings at the local (MSA and state) levels. “Health insurance markets are generally local.” Few insurers are considered “national” because enrollment is mostly concentrated geographically with licenses in single states.
Since most Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) insurers are licensed in a single state, they seem small at the national level, but in a majority of the country (41 states and 82% of MSAs), a BCBS insurer has the largest market share.
At the national level, the insurers with the most market share were:
Megamergers
The report comes on the heels of a proposed insurer merger falling through. Cigna recently ended its attempt to acquire Humana after the 2 companies failed to agree on a price. Back in the mid-2010s, health insurance megamergers were the big news. In 2018, The American Journal of Managed Care® named megamergers one of the hot health care trends of the year due to the finalization of 2 megamergers: CVS acquired Aetna and Cigna acquired Express Scripts.
Those mergers came after a wave of attempts, some of which were unsuccessful due to the Department of Justice (DOJ) blocking them. In 2016, DOJ had filed antitrust lawsuits against 2 planned megamergers: Anthem’s acquisition of Cigna and Aetna’s acquisition of Humana.
At the time, DOJ had alleged in the lawsuit that “These mergers would reshape the industry, eliminating two innovative competitors—Cigna and Humana—at a time when the industry is experimenting with new ways to lower healthcare costs.”
CMS' 340B Repayment Proposal May Harm Vulnerable Hospitals, Reward Those With Higher Revenues
April 26th 2024The 340B hospitals not receiving an offsetting lump-sum payment from CMS following 2018-2022 cuts later ruled unlawful are disproportionately rural, publicly owned, and nonacademic, according to a new study.
Read More
Navigating Health Policy in an Election Year: Insights From Dr Dennis Scanlon
April 2nd 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with Dennis Scanlon, PhD, the editor in chief of The American Journal of Accountable Care®, about prior authorization, price transparency, the impact of health policy on the upcoming election, and more.
Listen
Exploring Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization Variations
March 26th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the March 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on variations in prior authorization use across Medicare Advantage plans.
Listen
The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's) vote to ban most employers from issuing and enforcing noncompete clauses could have varying impacts on the health care workforce; federal regulators vastly under-enforced antitrust laws in the hospital sector during the last 2 decades, resulting in increased health costs; the FDA recently found genetic evidence of the H5N1 bird flu virus in pasteurized commercially purchased milk.
Read More