
Medicare Payment Rule Threatens Access to Life-Sustaining Kidney Care
The authors call on Congress to reform Medicare reimbursement for dialysis, saying the recent rule puts clinics at risk of closure.
Nationwide, the kidney care community faces myriad problems that are stretching resources thin and undermining patient access to care. As in many other health care sectors, the past several years have seen a growing workforce shortage among dialysis providers and nephrology registered nurses (RNs). High rates of burnout, an aging workforce, and the economic impact of the pandemic are all contributing factors to the dire situation kidney care professionals are confronting. Moreover, dismal reimbursement rates outlined in the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) payment
Meanwhile, the demand for dialysis services continues to grow. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the
A shortage of healthcare professionals and an increasingly high demand for care is a dangerous mix. We’ve seen already that workforce shortages are hindering dialysis clinics across the country by forcing them to reduce shifts or even close their doors entirely, often in rural or otherwise medically underserved areas. Despite this, CMS’ payment increase is substantially lower than rising costs, particularly the high labor costs for specialized nephrology RNs and other personnel who play a vital role in delivering high-quality, timely and life-sustaining kidney care. As advocates pointed out in a
The gap between the cost increases dialysis providers face versus what CMS is reimbursing them for directly and negatively impacts the ability of dialysis providers to adequately staff their clinics, ultimately impacting access to care. We have seen a significant loss of experienced staff and mentors, making it very difficult to foster growth of new staff that are just learning this specialty and the unique needs of individuals on dialysis. Safety and quality are getting harder to maintain as the focus of care is strained and limited to basic task completion.
These labor challenges will be particularly devastating to medically underserved rural and urban communities, forcing patients to travel hours for care because their local clinic has closed. It is also forcing patients to change established schedules and go to available treatments on sporadic or alternate days, significantly impacting their daily lives or ability to work and plan. There are even documented reports of patients losing their jobs specifically because of an incompatible dialysis schedule.
In the face of these challenges, CMS has failed to address the fact that its own assumptions used to set the annual payment update have been wrong during the last few years. As it does for skilled nursing facilities, CMS should increase the update factor to include the actual inflationary increase when their own estimates are incorrect. We also encourage Congress to pass the bipartisan
By working with the kidney care community to mitigate the cost of attracting and retaining skilled nephrology RNs and other kidney care professionals, policymakers can help expand, instead of restrict, access to vital dialysis services for millions of Americans.
Author Information
Jennifer Payton, MHCA, BSN, RN, CNN, is president of the American Nephrology Nurses Association (ANNA) and John P. Butler is former chair of Kidney Care Partners and CEO of Akebia Therapeutics.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.