Savings hospitals had lower baseline spending than nonsavings hospitals during the first year of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, according to a Research Letter in JAMA.
Savings hospitals had lower baseline spending than nonsavings hospitals during the first year of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, according to a Research Letter in JAMA.
Medicare’s CJR program offers bundled payments for hip and knee surgery at 799 hospitals that include payments for hospitalization and post-discharge care 90 days after the procedure into a single benchmark. The program incentivizes hospitals through bonus payments to exceed their quality and cost benchmarks. Overall, 67 urban markets in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) were required by Medicare to participate in the program.
Recently, Medicare has declared the most hospitals in 34 of 67 MSAs must continue participating in the CJR program, while low-volume hospitals could choose whether to continue or withdraw. The study evaluated Medicare’s change in policy and how it affects the future of mandatory bundled payment models.
The researchers used Medicare data to analyze the proportion, distribution, and quality performance of CJR hospitals that achieved savings during the first year of CJR. This was then compared to the pre-CJR baseline which took place from April 2015 to March 2016. Volume was calculated from 100% Medicare claims from 2015 to 2016.
Of the 799 CJR hospitals, 48% were savings hospitals, and mean episode savings ranged from $13.83 to $3590.97. 92% of the savings hospitals achieved good or exceptional level quality. Generally, savings hospitals had a greater number of hospital beds than nonsavings hospitals and had a greater average annual Medicare joint replacement value.
In addition, savings hospitals were more likely to be nonprofit, teaching, and integrated with a post-acute care facility compared to nonsavings hospitals. Nonsavings hospitals were more frequently considered safety-net hospitals. In terms of evaluating proportion, savings hospitals did not differ between mandatory and voluntary MSAs.
“Nevertheless, these findings suggest that certain hospital types may be better positioned to succeed in mandatory bundled payment compared with others, particularly as policy changes affect the number and composition of hospitals and markets required to participate,” the authors concluded.
References
Navathe AS, Liao JM, Shah Y, et al. Characteristics of hospitals earning savings in the first year of mandatory bundled payment for hip and knee surgery. JAMA. 2018;319(9):930-932. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0678.
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Thyme Care CEO and Cofounder Robin Shah
October 2nd 2023Robin Shah, CEO of Thyme Care, which he founded in 2020 with Bobby Green, MD, president and chief medical officer, joins hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, to discuss his evolution as an entrepreneur in oncology care innovation and his goal of positively changing how patients experience the cancer system.
Listen
HMO and EPO Insurance Plans More Likely to Promote Use of Biosimilars
November 21st 2023Health plan type highly influences the likelihood of biosimilar uptake, with low-flexibility insurance plans more likely to have patients who either switched to a biosimilar or were initiated on a biosimilar.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Dr Debra Patt of Texas Oncology
August 1st 2023Debra Patt, MD, PhD, MBA, joins hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for episode 2 of our newest podcast, "Oncology Onward: Conversations With Innovators and Changemakers in Cancer Care."
Listen
Therapists’ Perspectives on Access to Telemental Health Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youth
November 10th 2023This qualitative study elucidates therapists’ perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of access to telemental health among Medicaid-enrolled youth served by a large safety-net organization.
Read More