As our country continues its push to lower the cost of healthcare, especially among the burgeoning population of seniors with age-related disabilities, transitioning to a value-based insurance design payment model that rewards value, rather than quantity, will become progressively more important. In the realms of musculoskeletal pain and movement dysfunction, this transition must be accompanied with sincere efforts to identify treatments that can effectively manage pain and reduce the total cost of care.
This article was written by Nikesh Patel, PT, DPT, a physical therapist and executive director of Alliance for Physical Therapy Quality and Innovation.
As our country continues its push to lower the cost of healthcare, especially among the burgeoning population of seniors with age-related disabilities, transitioning to a value-based insurance design (VBID) payment model that rewards value, rather than quantity, will become progressively more important. In the realms of musculoskeletal pain and movement dysfunction, this transition must be accompanied with sincere efforts to identify treatments that can effectively manage pain and reduce the total cost of care.
Within this context, there is a growing recognition that a treatment approach beginning with early physical therapy (PT) not only reduces short- and longer term healthcare costs, but often decreases pain, improves function, and helps patients return to work.1 Further, a new report establishing benchmarks of quality care in the field of physical therapy found clinically important improvements in patient-reported outcomes were observed across body regions over 12-14 PT visits.2
It’s an approach that has proven valuable to countless patients and stands to benefit both public and private payers.
Physical therapists are highly trained professionals who assess and treat people of all ages and abilities to maximize their mobility and help them improve or maintain their function and quality of life. Given the many benefits of PT, the number of Medicare beneficiaries who have received outpatient physical therapy from this group of skilled professionals has increased in recent years from 3.96 million in 2008 to nearly 6 million in 2015.3-4
From a cost and outcomes perspective, it’s easy to understand the trend: PT is a cost-effective first intervention that saves time and money, especially when utilized early in the treatment process. According to a study conducted by the Moran Company, use of PT as a first intervention for lower back pain resulted in 19% lower costs to the Medicare program when compared with injections as a first intervention, and 75% lower costs when compared with surgery as a first intervention. Beneficiaries who received PT early (within first 15 days of their diagnosis) had lower average treatment costs than those who began PT later.5 In fact, those beneficiaries who received therapy within the first 15 days (compared to 45-90 days post diagnosis) had downstream costs that were 27% lower on average. Further, the evidence suggests that the frequency in which patients attend PT appointments can also impact cost. Patients diagnosed with lower back pain who visited a physical therapist between 9-to-12 times reduced Medicare Part A/B spending by 32% compared with beneficiaries who only attended a single appointment.
Amid an environment where there seems to be a high-dollar treatment for every condition, it’s remarkable to consider that relatively low-cost and non-invasive PT is making such a mark on reducing healthcare costs. Moreover, there is hope that increased access to PT can address a growing yet troubling trend affecting more and more older Americans every year: falls.
Each year, accidental falls among the elderly result in roughly 300,000 hip fractures and 800,000 hospitalizations.6 Worse still, an estimated 27,000 seniors die annually from fall related injuries— a number that will only grow as America's population becomes demographically older.7 The associated medical costs of these injuries are staggering. In 2015, the total medical expenses related to senior falls were estimated to be $50 billion—a cost borne by both public and private payers.8
According to the National Institute on Aging, PT is a simple solution that can increase senior mobility and reduce the risk of an accidental fall. The US Preventive Services Task Force gave its highest-grade recommendation to PT and regimented exercise to avoid unwanted slips.9 And, lastly, a recent study showed that older citizens who underwent an exercise intervention from a trained healthcare professional lowered their risk of a fall by 31%.10
With a growing population of American seniors, PT will be well placed to reduce both the rate of elderly falls and the associated downstream medical costs. Simply put, available evidence shows that efforts by payers to curb access to and use of PT through cumbersome preauthorization requirements, escalating co-payments, and needless bureaucratic hurdles only forces patients into more costly and less effective methods of treatment. As our system continues to transition from the traditional fee-for-service payment model to one that is based on value and outcomes, PT will play an increasingly important role. PT epitomizes the kind of quality treatment service that VBID seeks to emphasize, and payers should support— rather than discourage– PT as a way to enhance value in healthcare.