
Personalized CLL Therapy With MRD Guidance Improves Survival Outcomes
A study showed that using measurable residual disease (MRD) to guide ibrutinib-venetoclax therapy significantly improved progression-free survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy.
Tailoring
The phase 3 FLAIR trial found that MRD-guided therapy with ibrutinib and venetoclax not only extended progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine–cyclophosphamide–rituximab (FCR), but also allowed most patients to discontinue therapy early.
The study enrolled 523 patients with untreated CLL, randomly assigning them to receive either MRD-driven ibrutinib-venetoclax therapy or standard FCR. After a median follow-up of 43.7 months, disease progression or death occurred in 4.6% of patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group compared with 28.5% in the FCR group.
At 3 years, PFS was markedly higher in the MRD-driven ibrutinib–venetoclax group (97.2%) compared with the FCR group (76.8%). Similarly, overall survival at 3 years was 98.0% in the ibrutinib–venetoclax group, slightly higher than the 93.0% for FCR.
“The positive outcome of the FLAIR trial appeared most marked in patients with IGHV-unmutated CLL, with substantial improvements in progression-free and overall survival,” the researchers said. However, they noted that the benefit was not as pronounced for patients with mutated IGHV.
One of the most notable findings was that MRD-based monitoring allowed many patients to stop treatment early. At 2 years, 28.9% of patients in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group had stopped treatment due to achieving undetectable MRD, doubling to 58% of patients by year 3. Additionally, by 5 years, 65.9% of patients had undetectable MRD in the bone marrow, and 92.7% had undetectable MRD in peripheral blood.
“No plateau was seen in achievement of undetectable MRD in peripheral blood, which suggests that continued therapy informed by MRD is justified,” the authors said.
While the study confirmed the effectiveness of MRD-based treatment, safety concerns remain. The risk of infection was similar between both treatment groups. However, the rate of cardiac serious adverse events was higher in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group (10.7%) than the FCR group (0.4%). The ibrutinib-venetoclax group was also more likely to experience tumor lysis syndrome, though this was only 1 case, while severe infections were reported more in the FCR group.
“In the current trial, more cases of atrial fibrillation and hypertension were reported in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group than in the FCR group (findings that were consistent with previous findings), but these results did not translate into an increased risk of sudden death,” the authors added. “Whether these findings illustrate the effect of changes in the management of hypertension and cardiac side effects cannot be ascertained.”
On the other hand, patients receiving FCR had higher rates of hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (47.3% vs 10.3%) and secondary cancers. Notably, the incidence of secondary cancers per 100 patient-years was lower with ibrutinib-venetoclax (2.6%) compared with FCR (5.4%).
Ibrutinib was
Similarly, a
References
- Munir T, Cairns DA, Bloor A, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia therapy guided by measurable residual disease. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(4):326-337. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2310063
- Dangi-Garimella S. FDA Grants Accelerated Approval for Ibrutinib for CLL. AJMC®. February 13, 2014. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.ajmc.com/view/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-for-ibrutinib-for-cll
- Jacobsen-Sive K. Ibrutinib safe and effective in patients with CLL/SLL, real-world data show. AJMC. January 10, 2025. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.ajmc.com/view/ibrutinib-safe-and-effective-in-patients-with-cll-sll-real-world-data-show
- Turim Dickstein G. Real-world data confirm ibrutinib's role in relapsed CLL. AJMC. November 26, 2024. Accessed February 6, 2025. https://www.ajmc.com/view/real-world-data-confirm-ibrutinib-s-role-in-relapsed-cll
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.