The study supports earlier findings that warning labels affect parental choices of beverages for their children.
While teens drink less soda than they once did, a recent University of Pennsylvania study found that that three-fourths of them still drink some type of sugar-sweetened beverage every day. That’s why public health officials fighting childhood obesity see driving down the number of calories consumed in soda as such an important part of their efforts.
But what’s the best way to do this? Soda taxes like those adopted in the cities of Berkeley and Philadelphia have been fought vigorously by the beverage industry. Another solution studied is the warning label, pioneered decades ago as a tool to combat cigarette smoking.
Results of a controlled experiment published Thursday in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine1 finds that labels can have an effect on beverage choices by teenagers. In this intervention, a total of 2202 demographically diverse adolescents aged 12 to 18 years completed an online survey, which assigned them to 1 of 6 conditions:
· No warning label.
· A calorie label.
· 1 of 4 text versions of a warning label, which contained safety information that said drinking beverages with added sugar contributes to obesity, diabetes, and tooth decay.
The results showed significantly fewer adolescents chose a sugar-sweetened beverage when shown 1 of the safety labels (65%, 63%, and 61%, respectively) than when they were shown beverages with no label (77%).
There were several encouraging findings in the study. First, 2 of the warning labels caused the participants to report being less likely to buy sugary beverages in the future, and results showed the warnings appeared to have a greater impact than the calorie readings. Second, the influence of the warning labels did not vary based on the parents’ education level, which suggests that socioeconomic factors may matter less for these labels than for other nutrition labels, such as restaurant menu calorie information.
Overall, the study supports proposed laws in California and elsewhere that support warning labels on beverage packaging, the authors say. Earlier research on warning labels, which found they affected parents’ choices of beverages for their children, showed that support for labels was bipartisan, whereas soda taxes are highly controversial. Providing information is seen as giving something to the public that allows them to make an informed choice, as opposed to the burden of a tax.2
“Providing this kind of information is a classic public health intervention that has been used to minimize environmental exposure to toxins, increase sanitation to prevent food-borne illnesses, and reduce the use of tobacco products,” said Jim O’Hara, director of Health Promotion Policy for the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). “It’s time to use this public health tool in the fight against soda-related diseases.”
CSPI has strongly supported efforts to limit soda consumption as part of broader efforts to curb obesity and improve health.
Reference
1. VanEpps EM, Roberto CA. The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage warnings: a randomized trial of adolescents’ choices and beliefs [published online September 8, 2016]. Am J Preven Med. http://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(16)30258-6/pdf
2. Roberto CA, Wong D, Muscius A, Hammond D. The influence of sugar-sweetened beverage health warning labels on parents’ choices. Pediatrics. January 2016; DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3185.
How Can Employers Leverage the DPP to Improve Diabetes Rates?
February 15th 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Jill Hutt, vice president of member services at the Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health, explains the Coalition’s efforts to reduce diabetes rates through the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).
Listen
Balancing Care Access and Fragmentation for Better Outcomes in Veterans With Diabetes
April 22nd 2021The authors of a study in the April 2021 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® discuss the possible reasons behind the link between care fragmentation and hospitalizations in veterans with diabetes, as well as potential opportunities to address disjointed care in the context of the widespread telehealth uptake seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
What We’re Reading: ACA Perception; FDA Blood Sugar Warning; AI and Physician Burnout
February 22nd 2024More than half of US adults have a favorable view of the Affordable Care Act (ACA); smartwatches and rings that claim to measure blood sugar levels without piercing the skin could be dangerous and should be avoided; many believe artificial intelligence (AI) could be the solution to physician burnout.
Read More
Advancements in Diabetes Technology: Coverage, Challenges, and Pregnancy Considerations
February 15th 2024Expert interviews highlight advancements and challenges in diabetes care technology, including automated insulin delivery systems and continuous glucose monitors, as well as improvements in insurance coverage.
Read More