
Urban Institute Proposes National Healthcare Plan Combining Elements of ACA, Medicare
Another organization has announced a plan for making health coverage affordable, following a spate of similar proposals like “Medicare for All” and “Medicare Extra for All” and in the wake of continued efforts by the Trump administration to nibble away at the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Another organization has announced a plan for making health coverage affordable, following a
The
Although none of the proposals have any chance of being implemented in the current political climate, the authors of “The Healthy America Program: Building on the Best of Medicare and the Affordable Care Act” said that they “anticipate that public demand for improvements to the health insurance system will grow.”
Public support for the ACA, as well as Medicaid, has generally remained steady despite a failure by Republicans last year to repeal it outright.
Their plan would allow people to keep their employer-sponsored coverage, offer a range of insurer options and ensure pooling of healthcare risk, lack an employer mandate, provide income-related federal assistance, and create a more flexible individual incentive to remain insured than that under the ACA.
It would integrate Medicaid acute care for nonelderly people and the Children’s Health Insurance Program with coverage for people enrolled in private nongroup insurance and currently uninsured people into a large new Medicare-style marketplace. This marketplace would include both a public plan and private insurer options and would cap provider payment rates.
The Healthy America plan calls for saving money on prescription drugs, the topic of
The administration favors moves such as allowing
A few elements of the Healthy America plan include:
- Preserving ACA essential health benefits.
- Setting household premiums in a range from 0% to 8.5% of income; premium subsidies are tied to 80% in an actuarial value plan.
- Cost-sharing subsidies increase actuarial value above 80% for people with incomes up to 300% of FPL; cost-sharing options with actuarial value below 80% are also available.
- While there is a penalty for individuals remaining uninsured, it is structured as loss of a tax benefit (instead of a penalty), which can be partially refunded later if the taxpayer enrolls in coverage.
- Low-income people would automatically be enrolled.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.