Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA, CPEL

Tara Graff discussed how the introduction of tafasitamab into the R² backbone represents a natural next step for community oncologists who have already become comfortable with both components of the regimen, noting that many community practices gained experience with tafasitamab in the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma setting, meaning that adding it to a now-familiar R² backbone does not require learning an entirely new drug, but rather learning a new pairing with a well-understood side effect profile.

Real-world retina data shows aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab extend anti-VEGF intervals and target Ang2/Tie2 for AMD and DME.

Real-world retina data shows how aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab extend anti-VEGF intervals, guiding treat-and-extend for AMD and DME.

Tara Graff examined the evolution of R² in community oncology practice, reflecting on how the combination represented a genuine game changer when it emerged in the second-line follicular lymphoma setting approximately, offering patients a chemo-free option with meaningful improvements in PFS and time to next therapy that distinguished it from simply retreating patients with rituximab monotherapy.

Real-world anti‑VEGF outcomes lag trials as durability and missed injections matter; learn how evidence guides everyday wet AMD decisions.

How anti-VEGF injections reshape wet AMD, DME, and vein occlusion care, preserving vision—plus what real-world access barriers mean for patients.

Tara Graff described her approach to communicating PFS data with patients, explaining that rather than using clinical terminology, she frames progression-free survival in terms patients can connect with, presenting treatment options side by side and translating trial outcomes into plain language estimates of how long a given therapy is likely to keep their disease in remission.

Tara Graff noted that while RRFL patients themselves do not look fundamentally different between community and academic settings, what varies is how those patients are managed at relapse, with disease trajectory serving as one of the most critical and sometimes underappreciated factors in community practice treatment decision-making.

Multiple myeloma care shifts as CELMoDs, BCMA therapies, and frontline CAR T enable personalized, MRD-driven, risk-adapted, limited-duration regimens.

Led by the moderator, Christina Poh shared her closing reflections on the relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treatment landscape, expressing strong optimism about both the current state and near-term future of the field, noting that the development of many novel, highly effective treatment options over the past several years has fundamentally transformed what is possible for patients with this chronic, relapsing disease.

Christina Poh described the real-world data from eight CUBIC centers as highly encouraging, interpreting response rates that match or exceed those seen in pivotal trials in a heavily pretreated and older patient population as confirmation that bispecific antibodies are a broadly active and impressive class of treatment that already plays an important role in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.

Rising drug prices strain value-based oncology; experts weigh contracting, formulary choices, and home health dosing to cut costs and expand equitable access.

Clinicians brace for rapid multiple myeloma approvals, weighing patient-centered maintenance tradeoffs, long-term toxicity, costs, and emerging MRD-guided stopping decisions.

Christina Poh described the early phase efficacy data for golcadomide as highly impressive, noting that the high overall response rates and durability of responses a very promising signal that she expects will translate into a meaningful role for this first-in-class oral CELMoD agent in the relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treatment landscape in the near future.

Christina Poh discussed how the trial data reporting a PFS benefit of 88.9% versus 66.7% at 5 years and an OS advantage for IFRT plus rituximab maintenance in stage III follicular lymphoma does not entirely overturn the conventional view of radiation as a primarily early-stage tool, but does meaningfully challenge the assumption that radiotherapy has no role in advanced-stage disease while noting that additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and to evaluate radiation's role in combination with systemic therapies beyond rituximab.

How cost, access and pharmacy logistics shape second-line relapse therapy—CAR T vs bispecifics—plus strategies to win coverage and cut care costs.

Experts weigh BCMA vs GPRC5D bispecifics

Christina Poh examined the highly individualized nature of the rituximab versus obinutuzumab decision in follicular lymphoma, framing it as a patient-specific assessment that must weigh efficacy advantages against a meaningfully higher tolerability burden that may not be appropriate for all patients.

Christina Poh reviewed the inMIND safety data, noting that the addition of tafasitamab to the lenalidomide and rituximab backbone produced a manageable safety profile that was generally consistent with the R² backbone alone with no major unexpected safety signals observed and overall good patient tolerability throughout the trial.

Learn how myeloma experts sequence BCMA vs GPRC5D bispecifics, manage CRS with prophylactic tocilizumab, and plan for CELMoDs.

New myeloma data show teclistamab+daratumumab slashes relapse risk (HR 0.17), reshaping second-line choices beyond CAR T.

Christina Poh confirmed that the disconnect between provider and patient experiences of shared decision-making resonates strongly with what she observes in clinical practice, noting that while care teams tend to focus on efficacy and side effect profiles, the questions patients ask most frequently are logistical in nature, underscoring that closing this gap requires not only better communication, but also more robust patient navigation support, improved coordination between academic and community settings, and clinical trial designs that better reflect the real-world follicular lymphoma patient population.

Christina Poh discussed how she counsels patients on follicular lymphoma as a chronic, relapsing-remitting disease that is highly treatable, with many patients living for years or even decades with good quality of life, while being transparent that current standard-of-care treatments are unlikely to be curative, framing this honest, forward-looking conversation as the foundation for a long-term therapeutic partnership built on realistic expectations and shared planning.

Learn how daratumumab exposure vs refractoriness guides second-line myeloma therapy, and what MajesTEC trials suggest for BCMA bispecifics.

Explore how experts personalize second-line myeloma care at first relapse, weighing CAR T, bispecifics, and evolving sequencing amid rapid approvals.

In this episode, 'Streamlining Prior Authorization: Strategies for Securing Timely Access to New RRFL Regimens,' Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA, CPEL explores the following question:

This episode, titled 'NCCN Guidelines in Focus: Key Updates for Follicular Lymphoma and Their Impact on Formulary Decisions,' features Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA, CPEL discussing the following critical questions:

Experts weigh meaningful innovation in frontline myeloma therapy against incremental gains, spotlighting patient out-of-pocket costs, financial counseling, and payer-driven formulary decisions.

Experts discuss how MRD testing in myeloma increasingly guides frontline care, yet unanswered questions still limit using MRD as the sole benchmark.

In 'From Promise to Practice: Overcoming Access and Administration Challenges for Bispecifics in RRFL,' Ryan Haumschild, PharmD, MS, MBA, CPEL delves into the following critical question: