Opinion

Video

Measuring What Matters: Evidence and End Points That Define Disability in MS

Panelists discuss how robust clinical evidence from major studies like the EPIC and OPERA trials demonstrates that progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is the primary driver of confirmed disability progression in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with clinical parameters over 3 to 6 months being the most meaningful measures of treatment impact.

Video content above is prompted by the following:

The clinical evidence supporting PIRA as a legitimate concept in MS management is substantial and growing. Key landmark studies have validated PIRA’s role in disability progression, starting with the University of California, San Francisco’s 2019 EPIC data analysis following relapsing patients over 10 years. This study revealed that many relapsing patients showed gradual deterioration by 5 years, maintained at 10 years, initially termed “silent progression.” However, this progression wasn’t truly silent—it was simply subtle and slow, occurring in relapsing patients where clinicians weren’t actively monitoring for progressive disease development.

Subsequent validation came from the 2020 analysis of OPERA 1 and 2 phase 3 trials comparing ocrelizumab with interferon beta-1a in patients with relapsing MS. This analysis demonstrated that the majority of confirmed disability was due to PIRA rather than relapse-associated worsening, with approximately 5% of relapsing patients developing PIRA annually. The 2022 Novartis Oxford database study, encompassing over 27,000 patients, further confirmed PIRA as the primary driver of disability development in relapsing MS, particularly after 2 years of disease duration.

The most meaningful clinical metrics for assessing treatment impact on disability progression involve confirmed clinical parameters rather than surrogate markers. Confirmed disability progression, measured over 3, 6, or 12 months, provides increasingly solid evidence of neurological deterioration. Sustained disability progression, measured to study end, represents the most significant end point because some patients with PIRA may show improvement. These clinical measurements remain the gold standard for evaluating therapeutic interventions targeting disability progression in MS.

Newsletter

Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.

Related Videos
5 experts are featured in this series
4 experts in this video
5 experts are featured in this series
4 experts in this video
1 expert is featured in this series.
2 experts in this video
Related Content
AJMC Managed Markets Network Logo
CH LogoCenter for Biosimilars Logo