Currently Viewing:
Association of Community Cancer Centers Annual Meeting
The Price of Innovation When Improving Cancer Care Delivery
March 15, 2018
Dr James Hamrick Outlines Challenges of Managing Clinical Trials and Benefits of Community Practices
March 15, 2018
Changing Trends in Oncology Practice: Value-Based Care and an Empowered Patient
March 15, 2018
Why Tom Gallo Wants to Address Burnout During His Year as ACCC President
March 15, 2018
Roger Holzberg Discusses Integrating Technology Into Healthcare
March 16, 2018
Investing in the Vital Role of a Cancer Care Coordinator
March 16, 2018
Barbara Tofani: The United States Underestimated the Need for Care Coordination
March 16, 2018
Currently Reading
Technology Integration in Community Oncology Practice: Building the Future
March 16, 2018
Tom Gallo: Burnout Needs to Be Addressed for All Members of the Care Team
April 03, 2018
Tom Gallo Discusses How Burnout Is Increasing and the Role of Technology
April 06, 2018
Dr Kathleen Blake Discusses the Impact Healthcare Industry Changes Have on Burnout
April 23, 2018
Dr Mark Soberman on the Next Generation Multidisciplinary Cancer Care Team
April 27, 2018
Dr Mark Soberman on the Importance of Communication Among Integrated Care Teams
May 01, 2018
Dr Charles Saunders Outlines the Increasing Importance of Technology in Practices
May 03, 2018
Barbara Tofani: The Old Ways of Coordinating Care Are Gone
May 07, 2018
Dr James Hamrick: Community Practices Help Increase Diversity in Clinical Trials
May 08, 2018
Dr Kathleen Blake Highlights Telltale Signs of Burnout
May 10, 2018
Dr Yousuf Zafar Discusses the Burden of Financial Toxicity and Trends Over Time
May 14, 2018
Thomas Asfeldt Highlights 3 Key Challenges to Creating Integrated Cancer Care Teams
May 15, 2018
Pamela Tobias Discusses Pulling Data from EHRs to Improve Processes
May 15, 2018
Dr Mark Soberman Discusses Integrated Care Teams in Oncology
May 16, 2018
Dr Charles Saunders Highlights Data Collection Challenges
May 18, 2018
Dr Kathleen Blake Outlines How Burnout Affects Specialties Differently
May 21, 2018
Barbara Tofani Outlines Best Practices and Mistakes of Care Coordination
May 22, 2018

Technology Integration in Community Oncology Practice: Building the Future

Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
Finding inefficiencies in operational processes to identify gaps, improve symptom management and adherence, and optimizing value-based care—these are a few of the advantages of implementing technology in the daily operations of a community-based practice. This was the takeaway message from a series of presentations at the Association of Community Cancer Centers' 44th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit, March 14-16, 2018, in Washington DC.
Finding inefficiencies in operational processes to identify gaps, improve symptom management and adherence, and optimizing value-based care—these are a few of the advantages of implementing technology in the daily operations of a community-based practice.

This was the takeaway message from a series of presentations at the Association of Community Cancer Centers' 44th Annual Meeting & Cancer Center Business Summit, March 14-16, 2018, in Washington DC. Moderated by John Doulis, MD, Health Investment Partners Fund, presenters included Glenn Balasky, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers; Barry Russo, MBA, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders (CCBD); and Charles Saunders, MD, Integra Connect.

Russo’s presentation started with CCBD's experience with value-based care transition, which he said started with several pilot program participations, including the bundled payment model with UnitedHealth care and an episode-based reimbursement pilot. Additionally, CCBD was also one of the pilot clinics to participate in the COME HOME program, created by Barbara McAneny, MD, and Aetna’s Oncology Medical Home program.

Russo highlighted the value in keeping patients engaged through technology. “In 2015 we piloted a patient-reported outcomes mobile technology, called Navigating Cancer,” he said.  The company developed a tracking software for smartphones that allows the care team to remotely monitor patient symptoms and side effects. The software sends patients a text message that opens up a mobile app where they can report side effects, confirm medication adherence, and request a call back.

Transformation to value-based care is ongoing, Russo said. Process changes adopted by their practices included implementing clinical pathways, centralizing patient intake, and implementing a nurse navigation program. He warned that “a 1-size-fits-all approach will not work in this care transformation process,” and that practices should personalize adoption based on the dynamics of each group.

“We established an internal case management program, along with an array of essential support services, that included psychotherapy, genetic counseling, social services, and palliative care. Our technology modifications were made to support and scale patient care.”

Data, Russo said, has gained new importance today. “It is essential to understand claims data, process it, and abstract value-based information from it, which can be tough to evaluate when the sample size is small.” He recommended using actuarial support to assess some of the claims data. “This process is integral to determine areas of focus to improve value-based care,” Russo said.

Balasky narrated the challenge of coordinating practice changes across clinics that are spread over a 150-mile area in Colorado. “Each site has their own methods and practices, and delivering change at these multiple sites can be difficult,” he said. He brought up some of the issues around complicated phone systems, inefficiencies with workflows, and lack of actionable insights as some of the problems they face with their practices. “In addition to awareness of value and embracing technology, it requires buy-in from all involved, which can be tough across multiple sites,” Balasky said.

Lessons learned, he added, are that, while technology is essential, people and processes are just as important.

Saunders brought in the perspective of a technology vendor, who also has experiences from previous positions as a clinician and a payer (he worked at Aetna).

Speaking about the nuances of participating in the Oncology Care Model, Saunders said that the per patient per month payment of $160 asks for a lot in return: advance healthcare information, enhance 24-7 patient access, provide evidence-based treatment guidelines, etc. It therefore becomes essential for practices to think beyond drugs to achieve savings, because drugs can only provide a 20% to 40% opportunity for savings.

“How can you reduce your service costs?” is the question, Saunders said.

Team-based coordination and management of care using patient engagement tools (such as text messaging and patient portals) is important. “Portals are not used as much, though, and patients should be provided different options because use is driven by their age or comorbidities,” Saunders said.

Additionally, practices need to be thinking about revenue and risk management, population management, and medication management.

How can you solve the data gap problem for MIPS/APM reporting?

“Gaps can evolve at various stages of the workflow, during analysis, and then CMS might also drop some data. So manual chart abstraction may, unfortunately, be needed at some point,” Saunders said.

According to Saunders, data integration should closely track the following sources of data: claims, electronic health record, laboratory data, drugs, hospital, sociodemographic, patient-entered, and genomic data. “This information has to be ingested, scrubbed to clean up the noise, and then analyzed after normalization” to be able to draw actionable information for implementation in the clinic.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2019 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up