Currently Viewing:
American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting
Currently Reading
Persephone Trial: Cutting Trastuzumab Duration by Half Safer, Efficacious in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
May 29, 2018
Despite USPSTF Recommendations, Lung Screening Rates Low Among Heavy Smokers
May 31, 2018
Nelarabine With Chemotherapy Boosted Outcomes in Pediatric and YA Patients With T-Cell Cancers
June 01, 2018
Dr Leonard B. Saltz on Deciding When a Patient Should Receive NGS Testing
June 02, 2018
Promising Early Phase Results With bb2121 CAR T Treatment in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma
June 02, 2018
Dr Peter Paul Yu Discusses the Impact of Health Information Technology in Oncology
June 02, 2018
Identifying Rational Immunotherapy Combinations for Glioblastoma: A Progress Report
June 02, 2018
Dr James Lin Chen Outlines Information Needs in Era of Precision Medicine
June 02, 2018
Ellen Miller Sonet Highlights Financial Burdens of Patients With Cancer
June 02, 2018
Utilization Management in Oncology: Current Strategies and a Path Forward
June 02, 2018
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Improve Outcomes in Mismatch Repair Deficient CRC, but Can Induce irAEs
June 02, 2018
ZUMA-1: Response to Axi-cel at Three Months Prognostic for Remission in B-cell Lymphoma
June 03, 2018
Cetuximab With Chemoradiation Worse Than Chemoradiation Alone in Older Patients With HNSCC
June 03, 2018
Dr Michael Thompson: The Role of Precision Medicine in the Community Setting
June 03, 2018
Dr Victoria Villaflor Outlines Challenges With Pursuing Precision Medicine
June 03, 2018
Clinical Trials: Sharing the Road With Real-World Evidence
June 04, 2018
Phase 3 TAILORx Results Confirm Chemotherapy Unnecessary in 70% of Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer
June 04, 2018
KEYNOTE-042 Confirms First-Line Pembrolizumab Superior to Chemotherapy in PD-L1–Low Advanced NSCLC
June 04, 2018
Cemiplimab, in GOG 3016, Looks to Break New Ground for Immunotherapy in Cervical Cancer
June 04, 2018
Nearly Half of Patients With Metastatic CSCC Respond to Cemiplimab, on Fast Track at FDA
June 04, 2018
Opdivo Plus Chemo Boosts Progression-Free Survival 26% Over Chemo Alone in Late-Stage NSCLC
June 04, 2018
Managing Cancer-Related Pain in the Era of the Opioid Crisis
June 06, 2018
Discussing the Cost Burden of Cancer With Patients
June 06, 2018
Study Underscores Value of PROs in Improving Lung Cancer Survival
June 07, 2018

Dr Victoria Villaflor Discusses How Novel Therapies Have Changed Cancer Treatment

Immune therapies, or check point inhibitors, have been very successful in a subset of patient with multiple different types of malignancies and has changed their trajectory tremendously, explained Victoria Villaflor, MD, associate professor of Medicine, hematology and oncology, Northwestern University. 
 


Immune therapies, or check point inhibitors, have been very successful in a subset of patient with multiple different types of malignancies and has changed their trajectory tremendously, explained Victoria Villaflor, MD, associate professor of Medicine, hematology and oncology, Northwestern University. 

Transcript

How have novel therapies changed the cancer treatment landscape?

The premise of precision medicine, first and foremost, is to match the right patient with the right treatment at the right time. Immune therapies, or check point inhibitors, have been very successful in a subset of patient with multiple different types of malignancies and has changed their trajectory tremendously.

For example, melanoma has had a very high success rate with the immunologic therapies. As we all know, it’s where we started out in. President Jimmy Carter had actually gotten an experimental checkpoint inhibitor for his melanoma, which had traveled to his brain. He has been disease free for a number of years, potentially even cured, which doesn’t happen often, but it can happen with these therapies.

Additionally, there are lung cancer patients who have also benefitted tremendously form these therapies. Case and point are patient who have had greater than 50% tumor proportion score of PD-L1. These particular patients tend to have a very strong and lasting response to these drugs. However, it’s only about half of these patients who have these parameters.

I think there’s a lot of questions that still remain unanswered with them. I think they’re great therapies, they’re here to stay, and they do benefit some of our patients. But, my questions still remain: what is the proper sequencing of many of these agents? What should we be doubling them up with? Should we be doubling them up with anything? And, why are there patients who, in all rightfulness, should be responding to them and are not? Is it because of their innate immune systems? Is it because of other underlying comorbidities? Is it due to other problems within the microenvironment of these tumors? Even their microbiome, that remains pretty unclear at this time, and I think there’s a lot of work to be done.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2018 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up