Currently Viewing:
American Society of Hematology
Currently Reading
Dr Derek Raghavan Explains How Use of Guidelines Can Address Issues of Cost and Variation
May 26, 2018
Dr Shannon Maude: The Novelty of CAR T Treatments Requires Patient Education
May 01, 2018
Dr Derek Raghavan Provides Best Practices for Implementing Guidelines
April 26, 2018
Dr Thomas LeBlanc on the Importance of Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care
April 18, 2018
Dr Stephen Schuster: Unique CAR T Toxicities Require Provider Education
April 17, 2018
Dr Derek Raghavan Addresses the Concept of "Cookbook Medicine"
April 09, 2018
Dr Nina Shah Outlines New Treatments Being Studied for Multiple Myeloma
April 07, 2018
Dr Thomas LeBlanc: How to Increase Palliative Care Among Patients With Blood Cancer
April 02, 2018
Dr Thomas LeBlanc on Improving End-of-Life Outcomes for Patients With Blood Cancer
March 21, 2018
Dr Thomas LeBlanc: Patients With Blood Cancer and Palliative Care
March 10, 2018
Julie Wolfson: Supporting AYAs Before and After Treatment
January 14, 2018
Dr Julie Wolfson on What Clinicians Need to Understand About Adolescents/Young Adults With ALL
December 30, 2017
Dr Nina Shah on the Impact of New Treatments for Multiple Myeloma
December 29, 2017
Dr Stephen Schuster on Institution Commitments to Deliver CAR T Therapies
December 28, 2017
Dr Shannon Maude Discusses Side Effects of CAR T Therapies
December 25, 2017
Diagnosing Congenital Neutropenia
December 23, 2017
Dr Derek Raghavan: Ensuring Guidelines Are Implemented and Followed
December 22, 2017
New Drug Approvals in Leukemia and Lymphoma Presented at ASH 2017
December 18, 2017
Care Utilization Patterns in Sickle Cell Disease: Managing Pain and Care Transitions in AYAs
December 18, 2017

New Treatment Paradigm Supersedes ABVD in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: The ECHELON-1 Study

Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
Including the modified brentuximab antibody in the treatment regimen improved modified progression-free survival by 5%, although the rates of neutropenia and infections were higher in patients administered the brentuximab-containing regimen.
Phase 3 results from the ECHELON-1 study, presented at the 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology, showed superior modified progression-free survival (mPFS) after adding the modified anti-CD30 antibody, brentuximab, to doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This presents a significant change in the standard frontline regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), which has not been modified for over 40 years since it was first described, according to presenting author Joseph M Connors, MD, medical oncologist from the BC Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Canada.

About 30% of advanced-stage HL patients have relapsed or refractory disease following frontline ABVD. Add to that the pulmonary toxicity associated with bleomycin, which may then be dropped off from later cycles of chemotherapy.

Connors then shared the phase 2 results of ECHELON-1, which documented a 3-year PFS of 58% and a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 73%. “Of the 34 patients who had a complete response, 47% were progression-free at 53 months,” he added. “Several studies have demonstrated that intensifying the ABVD regimen in these advanced stage patients does not provide any survival advantage,” Connors said. Therefore, the considerations for their study design for the new regimen included:
  • Overall survival (OS) advantage
  • Duration of follow-up
  • Impact on fertility and short- and long-term organ damage
  • Economics, especially in the context of supportive care such as the need for growth factors
Patients enrolled in the open-label, global (218 study sites in 21 countries) ECHELON-1 study were randomized 1:1 to receive A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin 1.2 mg/kg, doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2) (n =664) or ABVD (doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, bleomycin 10 units/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2) (n = 670) on days 1 and 15 of up to six 28-day cycles. “Patients with a PET scan Deauville score of 5 after cycle 2 could switch to alternative therapy at the treating physician’s discretion,” Connors said.

Patients (n =1334) were stratified by region (Americas vs Europe vs Asia) and International Prognostic Score (0-1 vs 2-3 vs 4-7). Towards the end of the study, the independent data monitoring committee recommended primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony stimulating factor for newly randomized patients receiving A+AVD based on a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia in that arm. The primary endpoint was modified PFS (mPFS, defined as time to progression, death, or evidence of incomplete response followed by subsequent anticancer therapy) determined by independent review facility assessment.

At a median follow up of 24.9 months (range, 0-49.3), the 2-year rate of mPFS was 82.1% in the A+AVD group (95% CI, 78.7-85.0) compared with 77.2% (95% CI, 73.7-80.4) in the ABVD group. The hazard ratio for progression, death, or modified progression, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98; P = .03) corresponded with a 23% risk reduction.

Fewer patients in the A+AVD arm (n = 117) had events of progression, death, or modified progression, compared with the ABVD arm (n = 146). The trial documented the following secondary endpoints for A+AVD compared with the ABVD arm:
  • Complete response rate at the end of the randomized regimen: 73% vs 70% (P = .22)
  • Objective response rate at the end of the randomized regimen: 86% vs 83% (P = .12)
  • PET Deauville score 1 or 2 after frontline therapy: 85% vs 80% (P = .03)
  • PET Deauville score of 1, 2, or 3 after cycle 2: 89% vs 86% (P = .18)
Neutropenia was reported in 58% of patients receiving A+AVD and 45% receiving ABVD (febrile neutropenia in 19% and 8%, respectively), but discontinuations due to neutropenia or febrile neutropenia were low in both arms. Grade ≥3 infections were more common in the A+AVD arm (18%) than the ABVD arm (10%). In patients receiving A+AVD, primary prophylaxis with G‑CSF (n = 83) reduced febrile neutropenia from 19% to 11% and Grade ≥3 infections and infestations from 18% to 11%. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) occurred in 67% of patients receiving A+AVD and 43% receiving ABVD; 67% of patients experiencing PN in the A+AVD arm had resolution or improvement of PN at last follow-up. Pulmonary toxicity was more frequent and more severe with ABVD (Grade ≥3: 3% ABVD vs <1% A+AVD).

There were 28 deaths in the A+AVD group and 39 in the ABVD group; interim 2-year OS was 96.6% for the A+AVD group (95% CI, 94.8-97.7) and 94.9% for the ABVD group (95% CI, 92.9-96.4).

A+AVD had superior efficacy to ABVD in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage HL, with a 4.9 percentage-point lower combined risk of progression, death, or noncomplete response at 2 years, the study found. “This establishes A+AVD as a new frontline option for patients with advanced-stage HL,” Connors concluded.

Reference

Connors JM, Jurczak, W, Straus DJ, et al. Brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (A+AVD) as frontline therapy demonstrates superior modified progression-free survival versus ABVD in patients with previously untreated stage III or IV Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): the phase 3 Echelon-1 study. In: Proceedings from the 59th Annual Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hematology; December 9-12, 2017; Atlanta, GA. Abstract 6.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2018 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!