Currently Viewing:
National Association of ACOs Fall 2018
Stephen Nuckolls: ACOs Remain the Government's Best Option to Control Healthcare Costs
November 25, 2018
Allison Brennan Discusses Impacts of Certain Proposed Changes to the MSSP
November 24, 2018
Dr Joe Antos Dissects the Challenge of Addressing Drug Prices
November 23, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Highlights Areas for Continued Innovation With ACOs
November 17, 2018
Allison Brennan Outlines the Greatest Challenges of the Proposed MSSP Changes
November 11, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls Discusses What May Change Under the Proposed Pathways to Success
November 10, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider: MSSP Proposed Changes Will Be a Step Back on Path to Value
November 07, 2018
Dr Joe Antos: Attention Needs to Be on the Future Sustainability of Medicare
November 03, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus Discusses Measuring MSSP ACOs Savings
October 31, 2018
Dr Rob Fields: Proposed MSSP Changes Likely to Stifle ACO Movement, Increase Consolidation
October 30, 2018
Allison Brennan Highlights Areas of Opportunity With Proposed MSSP Changes
October 28, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider Highlights How Proposed MSSP Changes Build Stability Into Program
October 27, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls Outlines His Greatest Challenges and Opportunities of the Proposed MSSP Changes
October 22, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Discusses Why More ACOs Might Turn to Medicare Advantage
October 21, 2018
Dr Joe Antos: Proposed MSSP Changes Not a Major Shift in Policy for ACOs
October 18, 2018
Allison Brennan: Trump's Administration Is Encouraging Risk, but Possibly Too Quickly
October 16, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus: Private Payer Engagement in ACOs Is Up
October 15, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls: 2 Years Isn't Enough Time for an ACO to Take on Risk
October 14, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider on Handling Variability in ACO Contracts
October 10, 2018
Currently Reading
Are Commercial Payers Experiencing Success With ACO Partnerships?
October 08, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Discusses How the Proposed MSSP Changes Impact Decisions Around ACOs
October 08, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus Highlights Excitement and Anxiety at NAACOS Fall 2018 Meeting
October 06, 2018
Tying Social Determinants of ACO Patients With High-Need, High-Cost Care
October 05, 2018
Innovative Strategies Can Boost ACO Provider Engagement, Performance
October 05, 2018

Are Commercial Payers Experiencing Success With ACO Partnerships?

Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
At the National Association of ACOs Fall 2018 conference, private payers discussed how they are working with accountable care organizations (ACOs) to create new opportunities in the commercial market.
As accountable care organizations (ACOs) look beyond Medicare for accountable care contracts, they are increasingly engaging with commercial payers. At the National Association of ACOs (NAACOS) Fall 2018 conference, held October 3-5 in Washington, DC, Julian Harris, MD, MBA, president, CareAllies, was joined by Scott Hewitt, vice president, payment strategy and innovation, UnitedHealthcare; and Danielle Lloyd, senior vice president, private market innovations and quality initiatives, America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), to discuss how they are working with ACOs to create new opportunities in the commercial market.

Moderator Katherine Schneider, president and CEO, Delaware Valley ACO, kicked off the panel by saying that while NAACOS continues to evaluate significant changes within the ACO world, such as changes to the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), which are forcing ACOs to shoulder financial risks sooner, “Our focus today is to shift from MSSP and its offshoots and speak about our relationship with private payers.”

At CareAllies, a Cigna company, the strategy is to support care providers as they take care of their patients who may participate in different plans, either traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, or MSSP. “We support them through risk-based plans,” Harris said.

“At AHIP, which is a trade association of health insurance providers, we share best policies among our members,” said Lloyd. “We also have some partnerships like with the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association to run a survey and core quality measure collaborative with CMS.”
UnitedHealthcare has focused on value-based contracting for over 20 years, according to Hewitt. Speaking with The American Journal of Managed Care®, Lee Newcomer, MD, MHA, then senior vice president of oncology and genetics, explained that the 2 main types of contracts were bundled payments, where every service that a patient is provided during a predefined period is included under a single payment to the care provider, and episode-based payments, which are based on gain sharing.

Hewitt said at the NAACOS meeting that over 20 million lives are covered under commercial Medicare and Medicaid, and a majority are being tied to population health programs.

Emphasizing their role as facilitators of the value-based program, Harris said that providers may be at varying positions in the value-based journey. “Whether it’s fee-for-service, commercial value-based arrangements, or Medicare ACO: each needs different capabilities. This is where we come in, so the doctors can focus on patient care. That’s the approach we take,” he said.

“A joint operating concept works best so we bring each of our expertise to the table,” Lloyd said. She highlighted the need for not just data exchange between providers and payers—a lot of which is interoperability-related—but also the need for transparency. “Knowing how things are working on both sides is key for best practices.”

When queried on their biggest challenges, keeping track of quality metrics topped the list.

“Our quality collaborative with CMS [launched in 2016] brings all stakeholders together to improve quality care delivery,” Lloyd said, and has yielded 8 core sets of quality measures. “The payers at the table account for 80% of covered lives, and in 2017, these were implemented in 40% of the contracts,” she added, with hopes for better results in 2018.

UnitedHealthcare also tried to carve out a list of measures based on those that are used in the population, Hewitt said. Stressing the congestion in the field, he said that CMS alone is using 1000 different quality measures across their programs. “We narrowed this down to 4 sets of 16 measures, and they are all validated by a third party, such as by the National Quality Forum or the National Committee for Quality Assurance.”  

Hewitt also indicated that larger employers usually give them pushback and are not on board in terms of valuing quality metrics.

“I am cautiously optimistic about this, as I bring the journey into context,” said Harris. “So, we can have a narrow set of quality metrics but with caveats that recognize each subgroup and attributing the right metrics to each of them, such as Medicare versus Medicaid. I also think we have to get to a place where we can step back and say, ‘what problems are payers trying to solve and what are they concerned about?’”

He added that employers are currently worried about the affordability crisis in the commercial market, and stakeholders have a collective responsibility to help individuals; employers; and state, government, and commercial payers to stay viable.

When asked to share their thoughts on the proposed new MSSP rule by CMS, Lloyd said that AHIP is sending a draft letter to its members for feedback. “I’ll point out that we have shared our grievances with CMS via a multi-stakeholder letter,” she said, adding that they have expressed concerns with the risk pace. “We like the clarity of moving to risk, but our organization suggested 3-4 years as a reasonable pace for downside risk, but we also think that the level of sharing from 50% to 25% is not tenable.”

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2018 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!