Currently Viewing:
National Association of ACOs Fall 2018
Allison Brennan Outlines the Greatest Challenges of the Proposed MSSP Changes
November 11, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls Discusses What May Change Under the Proposed Pathways to Success
November 10, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider: MSSP Proposed Changes Will Be a Step Back on Path to Value
November 07, 2018
Dr Joe Antos: Attention Needs to Be on the Future Sustainability of Medicare
November 03, 2018
Currently Reading
Dr Clif Gaus Discusses Measuring MSSP ACOs Savings
October 31, 2018
Allison Brennan Highlights Areas of Opportunity With Proposed MSSP Changes
October 28, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider Highlights How Proposed MSSP Changes Build Stability Into Program
October 27, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls Outlines His Greatest Challenges and Opportunities of the Proposed MSSP Changes
October 22, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Discusses Why More ACOs Might Turn to Medicare Advantage
October 21, 2018
Dr Joe Antos: Proposed MSSP Changes Not a Major Shift in Policy for ACOs
October 18, 2018
Allison Brennan: Trump's Administration Is Encouraging Risk, but Possibly Too Quickly
October 16, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus: Private Payer Engagement in ACOs Is Up
October 15, 2018
Stephen Nuckolls: 2 Years Isn't Enough Time for an ACO to Take on Risk
October 14, 2018
Dr Katherine Schneider on Handling Variability in ACO Contracts
October 10, 2018
Are Commercial Payers Experiencing Success With ACO Partnerships?
October 08, 2018
Predictability and Simplicity Needed to Help ACOs Take on Risk, Panelists Say at NAACOS
October 08, 2018
Dr Rob Fields Discusses How the Proposed MSSP Changes Impact Decisions Around ACOs
October 08, 2018
Dr Clif Gaus Highlights Excitement and Anxiety at NAACOS Fall 2018 Meeting
October 06, 2018
Tying Social Determinants of ACO Patients With High-Need, High-Cost Care
October 05, 2018
Innovative Strategies Can Boost ACO Provider Engagement, Performance
October 05, 2018
Dr Joe Antos: CMS' Proposed MSSP Changes Don't Account for Variability in Healthcare
October 04, 2018

Dr Clif Gaus Discusses Measuring MSSP ACOs Savings

There are different ways to measure how Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) accountable care organizations (ACOs) have saved money, and the way used can drastically affect the amount of savings reported, explained Clif Gaus, ScD, president and CEO of the National Association of ACOs.


There are different ways to measure how Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) accountable care organizations (ACOs) have saved money, and the way used can drastically affect the amount of savings reported, explained Clif Gaus, ScD, president and CEO of the National Association of ACOs.

Transcript

NAACOS recently released a study about how much MSSP ACOs are savings, and the findings differ greatly from what CMS has reported but are in line with research out of Harvard. What are the savings NAACOS found and what is the controversy around how to measure savings?

So, there are really are 2 ways of measuring costs and performance. The first way is the MSSP benchmark way. The benchmarks are set based on historical costs, and over a 3-year period, and then trended forward for the performance year. However, those benchmarks are capped in terms of when risk changes and goes up, the benchmark doesn’t go up. So, the patients may become sicker in the subsequent years, and cost more, but the benchmark doesn’t increase. So, ACOs are against a much harder goal or bar of performance, and therefore not always achieving as much savings as much as they truly are.

The other way of measuring is to compare precisely the ACO beneficiaries based on their risk, based on their geography, their age, and match those beneficiaries to a control group of beneficiaries who are not in the ACO, but who are living in the same geographic area, have the same illnesses, etc. And when you compare those 2 groups—the ACO beneficiaries and the like nonbeneficiaries—over time, what you see is that the ACO beneficiaries’ costs are substantially lower than the control group by almost 2-fold.

So, CMS based on benchmarks was showing gross savings of, I think it was in the range of $900 million from 2013, 2014, 2015. But when you compare them to the savings from the control group, those savings were $1.8 billion. So, the savings essentially based upon that match control group are twice what CMS was estimating.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2018 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!