Currently Viewing:

Challenges for Practices Replacing Their EHR in 2016

Aiden Spencer is a health IT researcher and writer at CureMD who focuses on various engaging and informative topics related to the health IT industry. He loves to research and write about topics such as Affordable Care Act, electronic health records, revenue cycle management, privacy, and security of patient health data. You can get in touch with him on Twitter @AidenSpencer15

Barriers for Practices Making an EHR Switch in 2016
What challenges will practices choosing to make an EHR switch this year face and what can be done to overcome these barriers?

Meaningful Use
Practices looking to make the switch will need to focus on meaningful use (MU) regulations and how they can remain compliant for many years to come. In the next few years, more practices will begin attesting to MU and will need to ensure they can advance to stage 2 and stage 3.

Regardless of where on the meaningful use spectrum a practice is, a replacement EHR should offer functionality that meets all MU requirements for the long term. To do this, providers are encouraged to visit the Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology's website and match the MU criteria listed to an EHR’s existing functionality to determine if the system should be adopted. Don’t fall for what a vendor proposes their system will be able to do in the future, understand exactly what is does NOW.

Replacing an EHR system will come with a hefty price tag. Research suggests initial EHR cost average roughly $44,000 for each full-time provider. On top of this is an additional $8500 price tag for annual operating costs. As with any other long-term investment, providers should select a replacement system while considering the return on their investment.

Alternative Payment Models
The healthcare industry has already begun the transition from a fee-for-service model to a pay-for-service model. This migration will continue as efforts are made to decrease the cost of care while improving patient outcomes. Based on this continuing transition, practices replacing their EHR should make sure their new solution offers the necessary tools to monitor treatment outcomes and provide adequate analytical capabilities to flag any potential problems.

Too Many Choices
Consumers shopping for EHR systems will quickly find a flooded market with a high churn rate. This causes vendors to attempt to improve their standing in the marketplace by any means necessary.

Providers who only consider a few vendors, without examining a larger sample of options, may find they have purchased a “solution” with little support and limited functionality. In order not to overlook the right replacement system, physicians are encouraged to research and speak with multiple vendors before making a final decision.

Given the shifting expectations of meaningful use requirements and the continued evolution of the healthcare landscape, replacing an underperforming EHR system makes sense. Small practices will do well to recognize the challenges ahead of them to ensure they invest wisely and get a significant return.

Copyright AJMC 2006-2020 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome the the new and improved, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up