Currently Viewing:
Contributor
CMS Announces Transformative Updates to the MA VBID Model
February 18, 2019
Review Finds VBID Programs Improved Adherence at No Added Cost
August 01, 2018
Value-Based Insurance Design Highlighted at Two Congressional Hearings
July 02, 2018
CMS Rule Creates More Flexibility for Value-Based Benefits in Medicare Advantage
May 25, 2018
High-Deductible Health Plans a Problem for Patients With Cancer
May 10, 2018
Including VBID Principles Can Avoid Negative Effects of Outcomes-Oriented Contracts
April 19, 2018
Legislative Actions Encourage Value in Medicare Advantage and High-Deductible Health Plans
February 23, 2018
Addressing Rising Cost Sharing With Precision Co-Pay Assistance
February 08, 2018
A Year of Value-Based Insurance Design: 2017 Highlights
January 15, 2018
Study Identifies Unexpected Contributor to Rising Health Costs: Low-Cost Services
December 27, 2017
CMS Expands MA VBID Model Test in 2019
December 08, 2017
CMS Proposed Rule Allows Greater Flexibility for VBID in Medicare Advantage
November 25, 2017
Identifying the Top 5 Low-Value Services That Can Be Targeted for Reduction
November 10, 2017
VBID in Action: Connecticut Health Enhancement Plan
March 26, 2017
Healthcare Stakeholders Call for Flexibility in HSA-HDHPs
March 12, 2017
2016 Year in Review: University of Michigan V-BID Center
February 02, 2017
VBID and Medicare Advantage: Achieving Bipartisan Support
November 30, 2016
Understanding Clinical Nuance
October 25, 2016
Currently Reading
Implementing VBID in Medicare and Medicare Advantage
October 19, 2016
Adventures in Healthcare: The Dawn of the High-Value Health Plan
October 04, 2016
Reward the Good Soldier: A Dynamic Approach to Consumer Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs
September 26, 2016

Implementing VBID in Medicare and Medicare Advantage

Since its inception in 2005, the University of Michigan Center for Value-Based Insurance Design (V-BID) has led efforts to promote the development, implementation, and evaluation of innovative health benefit designs balancing cost and quality. A multidisciplinary team of faculty, including A. Mark Fendrick, MD and Michael E. Chernew, PhD, who first published and named the VBID concept, have guided this approach from early principles to widespread adoption in the private and public sectors. The Center has played a key role in the inclusion of VBID in national healthcare reform legislation, as well as in numerous state initiatives. The basic VBID premise is to align patients' out-of-pocket costs, such as copayments, with the value obtained from health services and providers.
This article was collaboratively written by A. Mark Fendrick, MD, director of the V-BID Center, and several V-BID Center staff. 

To contain Medicare spending increases without compromising quality of care, policy makers are exploring consumer-facing strategies that compliment provider-facing payment reforms. As healthcare expenditures have risen, payers have tried to alleviate the pressure on premiums by increasing patients’ cost-sharing at the point of ser­vice. In current Medicare benefit designs, out-of-pocket costs do not reflect the expected clinical benefit or value of care. Research indicates that increasing patient cost sharing not only reduces the use of non-essential care, but also reduces the utilization of essential care. Thus, more sophis­ticated benefit designs that can replace the traditional blunt cost-sharing structures are warranted.

Value-based insurance design (VBID) focuses on en­couraging efficient use of services by aligning patients’ out-of-pocket costs, such as copayments and deductibles, with the value of services. Essential to VBID are the tenants of "clinical nuance," which acknowledge that medical services differ in the amount of health produced, and the clinical benefit derived from a specific service depends on the consumer using it, as well as when and where the service is provided. Implementation of clinically nuanced cost sharing has been driven by private payers and was included in Section 2713 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), which eliminates patient cost-sharing for primary preventive services (for specified popula­tions) as selected by the US Preventive Services Task Force, the CDC, and other agencies.

Incorporation of VBID principles into Medicare and Medicare Advantage (MA) plans has garnered broad multi-stakeholder and bipartisan political support. The “Seniors’ Medication Copayment Reduction Act” (2009 S. 1040) sought to remove consumer cost barriers associated with high-value medications for conditions such as diabetes, asthma, and depression. VBID was highlighted in the 2010-2012 Medicare Payment Advisory Commission Reports to Congress. Subsequently, the bipartisan, bicameral, “Better Care, Lower Cost Act of 2014” (S.1932), called for an elective program that reduced cost sharing for high-value services for Medicare beneficiaries with chronic conditions.

Most notably, in 2015, “The Strengthening Medicare Advantage through Innovation and Transparency for Seniors Act of 2015” (HR 2750) was passed with strong bipartisan support in the House of Representatives, directing the secretary of HHS to establish a demonstration program allowing MA plans to test VBID principles. Shortly thereafter, CMS announced an MA VBID model test to assess the utility of structuring consumer cost sharing and health plan elements to encourage the use of high-value clinical services and providers. This demonstration was later expanded in 2016 to include 3 new states and 2 new chronic conditions.

 
Figure 1. MA VBID Model Test



An actuarial analysis of the fiscal implications of condition-specific MA VBID programs from the patient, plan, and societal perspectives was undertaken for diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and congestive heart failure (CHF) (Figure 2). The VBID programs reduced consumer out-of-pocket costs in all 3 conditions. Plan costs increased slightly for diabetes and COPD; there were savings in the plan for CHF.  From the societal perspective, the diabetes program was close to cost neutral; there were net societal savings in the COPD and CHF programs.

Figure 2. Actuarial analysis of MA V-BID programs, by condition and stakeholder.



VBID principles can be used to create MA plan designs that are better aligned with value. Encouraging the use of high-value services and providers, and discouraging those with low value, will decrease cost-related nonadherence, reduce healthcare disparities, and improve the efficiency of healthcare spending without compromising quality. The use of clinical nuance to set out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries would have significant positive impacts, providing consumers with better access to quality services and resulting in a healthier population.

 
Copyright AJMC 2006-2019 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
x
Welcome the the new and improved AJMC.com, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up