A longitudinal 5-year study that tracked women seeking abortions found that women who were turned away had worse mental health outcomes than those who received an abortion, contrary to some claims that abortion can have long-lasting psychological consequences.
A longitudinal 5-year study that tracked women seeking abortions found that women who were turned away had worse mental health outcomes than those that received an abortion. The results, published in JAMA Psychiatry, contradict warnings of lasting negative psychological consequences from abortion that can be found in some informational literature discouraging the procedure.
The study participants were 956 women who presented to abortion facilities seeking to terminate their pregnancies. Researchers assigned them to the near-limit group if they received an abortion while within 2 weeks of the facility’s gestational limit, the first-trimester group if they had an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy, or the turnaway group if they were denied an abortion due to being up to 3 weeks beyond the gestational limit. The women denied abortions were further divided into the turnaway-birth group, consisting of those who eventually gave birth, and the turnaway-no-birth group of women who miscarried or later had an abortion elsewhere.
Researchers assessed the participants’ anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction using self-reported answers to scales for each of these outcomes. They also recorded a number of potential covariables such as age, race, education, and history of mental illness. The women were then reassessed using the same scales in 10 waves of follow-up over the next 5 years.
Analysis of mental health outcomes found that the women who were denied an abortion, especially those in the turnaway-no-birth group, experienced higher levels of anxiety symptoms and more cases of anxiety 1 week after they were turned away. The turnaway groups also had lower reported self-esteem and life satisfaction at this baseline point.
However, these outcomes improved rapidly, and by 6 to 12 months after the initial interview, the turnaway groups had anxiety and well-being levels similar to those of the women who had received abortions. Over the 5-year study period, all of the women showed significant improvements in self-esteem and life satisfaction over time, except for those in the first-trimester abortion group, whose relatively high levels of initial well-being remained steady.
The study concluded that “during a 5-year period, women receiving wanted abortions had similar or better mental health outcomes than those who were denied a wanted abortion.” It did not find any evidence that would justify laws requiring that women seeking abortions be advised about potential mental health consequences.
A controversial example of these warnings can be found in an informational pamphlet recently updated by the Texas Department of Health, called “A Woman’s Right to Know,” which Texas law requires doctors to provide to women before a scheduled abortion. It includes a section on mental health risks like depression and suicidal thoughts, and states that women have reported “sexual dysfunction, avoidance of emotional attachment, flashbacks, and substance abuse” after their abortion.
Furthermore, a recently added section of this pamphlet, “Breast Cancer Risk,” has been criticized for its potentially misleading statement that women who give birth are less likely to develop breast cancer, but an abortion will not provide this increased protection. While the link between giving birth and reduced breast cancer risk has been proven, multiple studies have found no association between having an abortion and the risk of breast cancer.
Early Involvement Critical in Treating Immunotherapy-Induced Overlap Syndrome
April 19th 2024A series of case studies reveals the importance of early diagnosis and involvement of special teams of clinicians when dealing with potential cases of overlap syndrome, which encompasses myocarditis, myasthenia gravis, and immune checkpoint inhibitor–related myositis.
Read More
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Making Giant Strides in Maternity Health Through Baby Steps
April 9th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are kicking off a special month-long podcast series with our strategic alliance partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our first episode, which is all about the Baby Steps Maternity Program and its mission to support women throughout every step of their pregnancy journey.
Listen
Government agencies have created an online portal for the public to report potential anticompetitive practices in health care; there are changes coming to the “boxed warning” section for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR T) to highlight T-cell blood cancer risk; questions about the safety of obesity medications during pregnancy have arisen in women on them who previously struggled with fertility issues.
Read More
Real-World Study Reveals Key Insights Into DLBCL Treatment Patterns, Outcomes
April 18th 2024A recent study offers valuable insights into the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients across different lines of therapy, providing a look into the landscape of DLBCL management.
Read More