The American Journal of Managed Care February 2011
Health Insurance in India: Need for Managed Care Expertise
Health insurers in India currently face many challenges, including poor consumer awareness, strict regulations, and inefficient business practices. They operate under a combination of stifling administrative costs and high medical expense ratios which have ensured that insurers operate under steep losses. External factors (eg, onerous regulations, lack of standards, high claims payouts) and internal factors (eg, high administrative costs, dependence on indemnity models that cover inpatient treatment costs only) have forced the health insurance industry into a regressive spiral. To overcome these challenges, health insurers need to innovate in their product offerings and tighten their existing processes and cost structures. But as a long-term strategy, it is imperative that health insurers deploy managed care concepts, which will go a long way toward addressing the systemic issues in the current operational models of health plans.
(Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(2):e26-e33)
Managed care firms can play a key role in India's emerging health insurance sector and help strengthen the country's overall healthcare effectiveness.
- The health insurance industry in India today is loss making and does not use any managed care techniques.
- Simple and innovative managed care techniques can go a long way toward addressing many of the industry challenges.
- Because there is a need for expertise on policy formulation at the industry level, US managed care firms have the opportunity to play a key role in this emerging sector.
To address healthcare affordability, commercial health insurance was introduced in India by the government-owned general insurers as a standardized annual indemnity product in the mid-1980s, with a view to providing alternate financing options to members and helping them access better quality healthcare. Today, with the increased liberalization of the insurance industry, many private players have entered the health insurance market, resulting in increased awareness and growth of commercial health insurance (Figure 2). Currently, around 20% of the total population is covered under health insurance schemes, with the majority covered under either government or employer programs; regular commercial health insurance has less than 2% penetration.3-5
CHARACTERISTICS OF HEALTH INSURANCE IN INDIA
Despite the liberalized environment and increased presence of private insurers, the health insurance industry has been characterized by high government control and lack of innovation, which has stunted the overall growth. The sector has not evolved significantly enough to play a major role in the country’s health policy. Some of the systemic characteristics of the industry are listed here.
Health insurance is governed by the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority of India, which is the apex body for regulating all insurance firms (life, property, casualty, and health). Currently, health insurance schemes are mostly provided by life insurance and non–life insurance companies. Only 3 firms have recently started business as stand-alone health insurers. Hence most of the regulations covering health insurance flow down from the regulations for the life insurance and non–life insurance sectors, which include an approximately $25 million capital requirement to start a health insurance business. Moreover, current industry regulations prevent stand-alone health insurers from tying up with banks as a distribution channel. In India, banks have the maximum reach in terms of branches and geographical coverage, and are the primary channel for distributing all financial and insurance products.6 It is hence imperative that health insurance industry regulations get calibrated to reflect the business challenges.
Health insurance in India is sponsored by both government and private insurers. It was first marketed by the governmentowned insurers as a standardized annual indemnity product in the mid-1980s, and the premiums were largely based on the annual limit chosen and the age of the prospect. Today, more than 40 insurance firms (including life, general, and standalone health insurers) provide health insurance products.2(p7)
No Common Standards
One of the biggest drawbacks is the lack of standard terminology and protocol in treatment and billing of common illnesses. In many instances, different hospitals across the country use different terms and follow different treatment protocols and charges for treating the same medical condition.7 Additionally, hospitals provide diagnosis and treatment details in their claim forms in descriptive form (due to poor awareness of medical coding standards), which further complicates the claims analysis and processing for the insurers.
Domination of Indemnity Plans
Health plans introduced in India in the mid-1980s by the government insurers were standardized annual indemnity products covering only inpatient hospitalization. After the industry liberalization in the early 2000s, private insurance firms started to offer health insurance products. Despite the presence of many players, indemnity plans covering inpatient treatment costs continue to be the form that dominates.8
Presence of Third Party Administrators
Prior to the industry liberalization, health insurance products were provided only by the government insurers, and they depended on unorganized intermediaries to help sell and administer these health products. In order to regulate these intermediaries, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Regulations Act (2001) formalized the role and regulations of these healthcare intermediaries and renamed them Third Party Administrators (TPAs). Although the original role of a TPA was to provide the back-office administrative services to insurance companies, most TPAs today also deal with provider networks and claims payments. Currently there are more than 25 TPAs in operation, processing more than 2.4 million claims annually.2(p121) For these services, the health insurers pay around 5% of the premium collected as fees to the TPAs.
High Administrative Costs
Health insurance products carry a high administrative cost component. Without in-house health expertise, the industry depends on agents and TPAs to market and administer the health business by paying high fees. Hence, adminn istrative expenses are more than 35%, inclusive of agent fees of around 5%, TPA fees of 5%, and insurer’s operational expenses of 20%.9(p283)
High Medical Expense Ratio
Since the parent insurance firms are focused on other sectors (such as life and property), the firms have no incentive to innovate on health products and prefer to subsidize their health products, resulting in unprofitable operations. With poor product innovation and misaligned pricing and benefit design, the medical expense ratio (also known as the incurred claims ratio) runs at more than 100% of the premium collected for most insurers.2(p110)
Despite the robust growth in health insurance and increased awareness among consumers, the health insurance industry is not profitable. The combination of high administrative costs and high medical expense ratios has ensured that health insurers continue to have steep losses (Figure 3).
A quick analysis of the above aspects reveals that the industry operates in an environment which is not sustainable in the current form. The external factors (eg, onerous regulations, lack of standards, high claims payouts) and internal factors (eg, high administrative costs, dependence on indemnity models) have forced the health insurance industry into a regressive spiral. In the face of the above challenges, health insurers will need to change their business models to ensure ongoing and sustainable operations.
INNOVATING WITHIN THE EXISTING FRAMEWORK
The expeditious approach for health insurers would be to innovate within the existing operational framework by introducing new products and streamlining the processes to bring
about more efficiency in their operations.
Currently, health products cover only inpatient treatment. Due to the nature of the benefit coverage, the insurer is brought into the care context only at the critical or inpatient treatment phase. The insurer neither has prior insight into the care pathway nor is updated on the earlier treatment stages and protocols. Health insurers have to innovate by offering benefits that cover outpatient, drug, and wellness (preventive care) programs. By expanding the benefits, insurers will get more insight and flexibility into managing the care pathways and can focus more on preventive care and reduce avoidable hospitalization.
Widen Product Offerings
Health insurers need to reassess the indemnity-dominated model by introducing plans that incorporate better risk sharing between stakeholders. Given that consumers in India tend to pay a higher out-of-pocket component, firms have to focus on products that combine indemnity with member liability such as copays, coinsurance, and deductibles. Also, given that India is traditionally a savings-led economy, health insurers have to create products with a strong savings and investment component. For example, in the life insurance sector (Figure 4), more than 90% of the policies sold have a savings or investment objective (such as money-back, profit-sharing, equity-linked, and mutual fund investment products).
Widen Consumer Base
Health insurers also need to widen the target pool of consumers. Currently, almost all health products are targeted at the middle-class segment of the population, with typical annual premiums of around $100 per member for an indemnity with annual maximum cover of $10,000.12 When compared with a mature health insurance market (such as that in the United States), the premium rates in India do not align with the overall health economics of the country (Table 1). For example, the average premium in India is twice the per capita spending on healthcare, whereas in the United States the premium is half the per capita spending on healthcare. This kind of pricing has made health insurance unaffordable for the majority of the population and has resulted in products having limited market acceptance. A more careful assessment of the market and a more realistic pricing of the product, in alignment with the acceptable price points, will ensure wider acceptance of health insurance.
Controlling Administrative Costs
The industry needs to be proactive in controlling administrative costs. Some recent developments seem to suggest that the major players in the industry have recognized this need and have identified key measures for managing administrative costs. One of the recent trends has been to bring TPA services in-house with the objective of saving the TPA fees and providing better customer service.17
The above approaches primarily impact the marketing and administration aspects of health insurance and are limited in their effectiveness in addressing the broader challenges in the industry, such as the high medical expense ratios. Hence, health insurers have to evaluate managed care techniques to help bring wider and sustainable improvements to the overall healthcare value chain.
NEED FOR APPLYING MANAGED CARE TECHNIQUES