Currently Viewing:
Currently Reading
5 Takeaways From AHIP's Health Insurance Exchanges Forum and National Health Policy Conference
March 11, 2016 – Laura Joszt
What We're Reading: California's Aid-in-Dying Law Takes Effect June 9
March 11, 2016 – AJMC Staff
Expert Advises Physicians on What to Expect From Medicare in 2016
March 10, 2016 – Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
Dr Stephen Ondra: Consistency Is Driving Payment Reform Momentum
March 10, 2016
Patients' Perspectives on the State of Healthcare in America
March 09, 2016 – Jackie Syrop
Task Force Report Suggests Implementing Team-Based Care
March 09, 2016 – Brenna Diaz
What We're Reading: Prescription Drugs 16.7% of Overall Healthcare Spending
March 09, 2016 – AJMC Staff
New Payment Model Will Test High-Value Prescription Drug Use Under Part B
March 08, 2016 – Surabhi Dangi-Garimella, PhD
What We're Reading: Big Decline in Rate of Unintended Pregnancies
March 08, 2016 – AJMC Staff

5 Takeaways From AHIP's Health Insurance Exchanges Forum and National Health Policy Conference

Laura Joszt
The Affordable Care Act and rising healthcare spending were the main topics of conversation at America’s Health Insurance Plans Health Insurance Exchanges Forum and National Health Policy Conference, which were held March 8-10 in Washington, DC.
3. Transparency is a start, but must be done right
The cost of healthcare and of drugs in particular was a hot topic at the meeting, and transparency was brought up in more than 1 session. Bennett may have said it best: transparency “is a start. I’m not so optimistic that it will be enough.”
Len M. Nichols, PhD, professor of health policy and Director of the Center for Health Policy Research and Ethics in the College of Health and Human Services at George Mason University, discussed transparency around research and development costs. He explained that R&D costs for a drug don’t actually affect the price of that drug—the price of a drug is what the market will bear and the profits from that drug fund today and tomorrow’s R&D. As a result, trying to figure out what the R&D costs for a drug were is “a waste of time.”
Gaynor also touched on transparency as it relates to healthcare spending in general. He said that transparency is important and while only a small proportion of people are going to be responsive to price information, there are a couple of challenges.
“We are increasingly seeing more cost sharing—high deductible health plans that kinds of things—and encouragement for consumers to be more active shoppers and they literally can’t do that if they don’t have the information,” Gaynor said.
4. Changes to the ACA unlikely after the election
After James C. Capretta, a visiting fellow with the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), outlined the recent plan AEI released on how to improve healthcare and replace the ACA, he candidly admitted that there is unlikely to be a huge movement in health systems. If Hillary Clinton is elected, she will maintain the status quo and build on the ACA, and Capretta didn’t seem to confident if the Republican frontrunner, Donald Trump was elected.
“For a time I thought if an alternative candidate were elected perhaps this approach [the plan from AEI] would be something they would be thinking about,” he said. “For obvious reasons, I seem a little less confident about that.”
Candy Crowley, the former chief political correspondent for CNN, also discussed the outcome of the presidential election and its impact on healthcare. She also believed Clinton and Trump will be the nominees. Overall, she doesn’t expect much to change regardless of who wins and that the basics—mandated coverage, the healthcare marketplace, and subsidies—will be hard to undo.
“Obamacare has survived 2 giant legal challenges, 2 mid-term elections, and 1 general election,” she said. “I think it’s here to stay in its structure.”
5. State-based exchanges are in the best interest of the states
The executive directors of the Nevada and California state exchanges had nothing but good things to say about not being on the federally facilitated marketplace. The 2 states have a very different experience as state exchanges since Nevada has a much smaller population (2.839 million in Nevada vs 38.8 million in California).
Both executive directors touted the benefit of having local control of the insurance market thanks to the state exchange.
“Insurance is local,” said Bruce Gilbert of the Silver State Health Insurance Exchange. “Insurance is not federal.”
Peter V. Lee, Esq, of Covered California echoed that sentiment and that being a state exchange gives California a little more flexibility. One of consideration is to offer coverage on the exchange to undocumented citizens. They would not be eligible for subsidies, so the initiative wouldn’t use federal funds. But the benefit to the state is that some families are mixed with one parent being undocumented and the rest of the family legal. As a result, the whole family is afraid to get health insurance.

Copyright AJMC 2006-2020 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome the the new and improved, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up