Patients often stop statin treatment following an adverse reaction; however, new research finds an association between continued statin prescriptions after an adverse reaction and a decreased incidence of death and cardiovascular events.
Patients often stop statin treatment following an adverse reaction; however, new research finds an association between continued statin prescriptions after an adverse reaction and a decreased incidence of death and cardiovascular events.
A new study published by the Annals of Internal Medicine evaluates the relationship between continued statin prescriptions in a 12-month period following an adverse reaction, and a subsequent cardiovascular or death. The study participants were receiving statin prescriptions and had primary care providers with Brigham and Women’s Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital between 2000 and 2011. In addition, each participant experienced an adverse reaction, presumed to be a result of the statin, that was documented by the provider during the study period.
The data was collected from electronic medical records (EMR). The patient was categorized as continuing to receive statin prescriptions, if they received another prescription for a statin during the treatment period, and the comparison group was composed of those who did not receive statin prescriptions after the adverse reaction.
The study included 28,266 participants and 19,989 patients (70.7%) continued to receive satin prescriptions while 8277 did not. A majority (80.9%) of the adverse reactions were identified from the provider notes in the EMR, 10.8% were identified from the EMR data, and 8.3% were present in both sources.
The primary outcome was determined as the first to occur of either myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from any cause. Four years following the presumed adverse event, the total incidence of the composite primary outcome was 12.2% for patients with continued statin prescriptions and 13.9% for those without them. This suggests that statin prescriptions are associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular events and death among those with a presumed adverse reaction.
“Whether therapy should be continued after an adverse reaction is an important decision that must take into account the balance of potential benefits and risks to the patient,” the authors concluded. “This study's findings may help patients and their clinicians inform their choice of treatment to best fit each patient's circumstances.”
Real-World Study Reveals Key Insights into DLBCL Treatment Patterns, Outcomes
April 18th 2024A recent study offers valuable insights into the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in patients across different lines of therapy, providing a look into the landscape of DLBCL management.
Read More
Pegcetacoplan for PNH More Cost-Effective Than Anti-C5 Monoclonal Antibodies
April 18th 2024A cost-utility analysis conducted from the perspective of the Italian health system found that pegcetacoplan was more effective and less costly than 2 complement 5 (C5) inhibitors for the treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).
Read More
Many Patients With Psoriasis in Clinical Trials Experience Nocebo Effects, Study Finds
April 18th 2024Half of patients exposed to placebo in clinical trials experienced adverse events (AEs), which may be partially explainable by nocebo effects, according to a recent review and meta-analysis.
Read More
Low-Volume Hospitals Had Higher Reoperation Rate, Postoperative Complications in CRC
April 18th 2024Patients opting for elective colorectal surgery to address colorectal cancer (CRC) could have different rates of reoperation and postoperative complications based on the size of the hospital.
Read More