Currently Viewing:
Currently Reading
What We're Reading: States to Recalibrate Hospital Payments; Mumps Outbreak; Tuberculosis Eradication Plan
March 21, 2019 – AJMC Staff
Novo Nordisk Seeks Oral Semaglutide Approval, CV Indications on New Drug and Injectable
March 21, 2019 – Mary Caffrey and Samantha DiGrande
Continuing Systemic Treatment in Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma Associated With Lower Healthcare Costs
March 20, 2019 – Mary Caffrey
Genomic Testing Can Reduce Costs by $6600 for Certain Patients With Breast Cancer
March 20, 2019 – Laura Joszt
Adherence to COPD Treatment Lower With 3 Inhalers Compared With 2
March 20, 2019 – Jaime Rosenberg
CDC Says New HIV Transmissions Stem From Lack of Treatment, Unawareness of Infection
March 20, 2019 – Wallace Stephens
What We're Reading: Postpartum Depression Drug Approval; Marijuana and Psychosis; Mississippi Abortion Bill
March 20, 2019 – AJMC Staff
AHIP, Employer Groups Seek Congressional Action on Surprise Medical Bills
March 19, 2019 – Allison Inserro
The Current Landscape of CGRP Inhibitor Coverage
March 19, 2019 – Samantha DiGrande

NCCN Report on CAR T-Cell Therapy, Recommendations for Future Use

Samantha DiGrande
A recent report from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) investigated the current state of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and future strategies to consider as the novel immunotherapy evolves and is used in the treatment of more patients. 
A recent report from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) investigated the current state of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and future strategies to consider as the novel immunotherapy evolves and is used in the treatment of more patients. 

There are 2 CAR T-cell therapies approved by the FDA and currently available on the market, tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), sold at $475,000 and $373,000, respectively. According to the NCCN, most commercially insured patients have coverage for at least 1 of the approved products, but specific plans or employer-sponsored groups may have limitations on patient’s clinical eligibility. Due to the therapies only being commercially available for about a year, there are still not finalized policies around payment and reimbursement. NCCN has recommended that “improved standardized reimbursement structures are needed to enhance the use of CAR T-cell therapy in cancer management.” 
While there are several toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy, 2 of the most common found in patients with hematologic malignancies are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicity, which can also be referred to as CAR-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES). Several studies have established toxicity grading criteria and management algorithms; however, NCCN notes that as the use of CAR T-cell therapy expands to treat multiple malignancies, there is a growing need for standardization in terms of management strategies, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and patient selection in order to minimize toxicities and maximize effectiveness of the treatment. 

More recently, researchers have sought to identify the possible utilization of CAR T-cell therapies beyond hematologic malignancies, specifically in solid tumors. This has proved challenging “due to heterogeneous antigen expression, immunosuppressive networks in the tumor microenvironment limiting CAR T-cell function and persistence, and suboptimal trafficking to solid tumors.” Importantly, NCCN noted that standardized procedures for monitoring CAR T-cell persistence and disease surveillance are still needed to determine any potential long-term effects of the treatment. 

Though the process of launching FDA-approved CAR T-cell products involves many critical components, it is equally as essential to have dedicated and trained personnel in each of the clinical and administrative departments that manage work associated with CAR T-cell therapy. Every organization looking to administer this therapy to patients also needs to consider the implementation of a variety of different support systems, such as program and infrastructure development, psychosocial support, institutional protocols, and cost and coverage considerations.

Specifically, in terms of program and infrastructure development, organizations need to determine whether current facilities have the capacity to scale production to predicted volume levels, or whether additional units may be required. Psychosocial support is also a critical function of the clinical team, as oncology social workers provide psychosocial assessments to determine a patient’s strengths and available resources, as well as identify any barriers that may affect treatment. 

Finally, although NCCN recognizes a need to develop CAR T-cell therapy–specific guidelines, until there is a uniform approach to these treatments, creating standard guidelines remains a challenge. “As the data develop and mature, such guidelines will help stratify commonalities and differences in terms of product-specific management.”


Ogba N, Arwood N, Bartlett N, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018; 16(9):1092-1106. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0073

Related Articles

MEDCAC Panel Mostly Endorses PROs for CAR T Therapies
Podcast: This Week in Managed Care—Patient-Reported Outcomes With CAR T and Other Health News
UK Knocks Down Yescarta as CAR T Therapy Gains European Authorization
Copyright AJMC 2006-2018 Clinical Care Targeted Communications Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome the the new and improved, the premier managed market network. Tell us about yourself so that we can serve you better.
Sign Up

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!