While one study identified novel mutations and gene amplifications, the other found a wider gap in racial disparity with respect to mortality rates.
Investigators with The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network have identified 8 new genes following molecular characterization of 228 primary cervical cancers, which can help subclassification of the disease and develop more personalized targeted therapies.
The study, published in Nature,1 conducted a comprehensive analysis of the genomes of 178 primary cervical cancers, and found that more than 70% of the tumors had genomic alterations in either one or both of 2 important cell signaling pathways. Surprisingly, a subset of the tumors was not positive for the human papillomavirus, which is the most common cause of cervical cancer. The analysis showed that SHKBP1, ERBB3, CASP8, HLA-A, and TGFBR2 were significantly mutated in the tumor samples, while D274/PD-L1, PDCD1LG2/PD-L2, and the BCAR4 lncRNA were significantly amplified.
Akinyemi Ojesina, MD, PhD, assistant professor in the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who’s one of the corresponding authors on the study is excited with the prospect of developing novel targeted therapies for cervical cancer.
Another exciting finding is the mutations in genes that express PD-L1 and PD-L2, which are targets of immunotherapies that are already approved in other cancer types like melanoma and lung cancer.
This study was published on the same day as another study published in the journal Cancer,2 which found that the death rate from the disease is much higher than was previously thought. More importantly, the racial disparity is much wider, the study found. After correcting for the prevalence of hysterectomy, the authors estimated the deaths due to cervical cancer for both white and black women after stratifying based on age, state, and age.
The results were surprising. The mortality rate nearly doubled for black women: from 5.7 per 100,000 (95% CI, 5.5-6.0) to 10.1 per 100,000 (95% CI, 9.6-10.6). The death rate for white women after correction increased from 3.2 per 100,000 (95% CI, 3.1-3.2) to 4.7 per 100,000 (95% CI, 4.6-4.8). The highest mortality was observed in women older than 85 years: 37.2 deaths per 100,000.
The authors noted a need to improve screening efforts while simultaneously raising public awareness on the importance of screening.
References
1. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer [published online January 23, 2017]. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature21386.
2. Beavis AL, Gravitt PE, Rositch AF. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States [published online January 23, 2017]. Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30507.
Government agencies have created an online portal for the public to report potential anticompetitive practices in health care; there are changes coming to the “boxed warning” section for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies (CAR T) to highlight T-cell blood cancer risk; questions about the safety of obesity medications during pregnancy have arisen in women on them who previously struggled with fertility issues.
Read More
Gene, Light Therapy Combo Shows Promise Against Prostate Cancer Cells in Proof-of-Concept Study
April 18th 2024In their preclinical model, the researchers found efficacy both in vitro and in vivo by using CRISPR-Cas9 to mimic porphyria and combining the technology with light therapy.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Penn Medicine's Dr Justin Bekelman
December 19th 2023Justin Bekelman, MD, director of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, sat with our hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, for our final episode of 2023 to discuss the importance of collaboration between academic medicine and community oncology and testing innovative cancer care delivery in these settings.
Listen
Many Patients With Psoriasis in Clinical Trials Experience Nocebo Effects, Study Finds
April 18th 2024Half of patients exposed to placebo in clinical trials experienced adverse events (AEs), which may be partially explainable by nocebo effects, according to a recent review and meta-analysis.
Read More