• Center on Health Equity and Access
  • Clinical
  • Health Care Cost
  • Health Care Delivery
  • Insurance
  • Policy
  • Technology
  • Value-Based Care

What We're Reading: Anthem Blue Cross Fined; Healthcare for the Homeless; J&J Versus FDA

Article

California hands down millions in fines to Anthem Blue Cross; “street medicine” aims to bring healthcare to the homeless in Atlanta; Johnson & Johnson claims its baby powder is safe.

Anthem Blue Cross Tops the List of Most-Fined Insurers in California

Anthem Blue Cross in California was fined almost $9.6 million between January 2014 and November 2019 by the state’s Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC), according to California Healthline, for violations that included not covering out-of-network care that should have been covered and wrongly denying claims. That is close to 44% of all penalties for the period. In 2017 alone, Anthem was fined $5 million for letting customer issues drag on for too long, which was eventually negotiated down to $2.8 million and a promise to use $8.4 million for improvements. In total, DMHC has fined licensed health plans $73 million since 2000, its first year.

Compassion and Understanding Bring Healthcare to the Underserved

Mercy Care in Atlanta, Georgia, brings healthcare to the homeless on a daily basis, Kaiser Health News reports, spending close to $900,000 each year since 2013, when its street medicine program began. Outreach personnel include social workers, mental health specialists, and nursing students on 4-week rotations who strive to gain the trust of their often-stigmatized clientele before offering counseling, blood pressure measurements, and flu shots—among the many services they provide. In a non—Medicaid expansion state, Mercy Care hopes to prevent repeated visits to the emergency department, saving money in the process.

Asbestos Tests Come Up Negative for Johnson & Johnson

Following a voluntary October recall of 1 lot of its Baby Powder—33,000 bottles in the United States—Johnson & Johnson conducted 155 tests via 4 testing methods at 2 third-party labs, contesting claims by the FDA that the powder contains trace amounts of asbestos, according to Reuters. This follows testing also completed in October, with similar results. J&J states that the FDA’s results may be due to sample contamination or lab analyst error, possibly both. J&J has faced increasing scrutiny over the years from lawsuits over baby powder, opioids, and Risperdal, an antipsychotic, among others.

Related Videos
Dr Sophia Humphreys
Robert Zimmerman, MD
Video 15 - "Ensuring Fair Cardiovascular Care for All: Concluding Perspectives on Disparities and Inclusion"
Shawn Tuma, JD, CIPP/US, cybersecurity and data privacy attorney, Spencer Fane LLP
Ryan Stice, PharmD
Raajit Rampal, MD, PhD, screenshot
Leslie Fish, PharmD.
Ronesh Sinha, MD
Adam Colborn, JD
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences
AJMC®
All rights reserved.