- Center on Health Equity and Access
- Clinical
- Health Care Cost
- Health Care Delivery
- Insurance
- Policy
- Technology
- Value-Based Care
A National Health Insurance Enrollment System? Maybe.
With 36 states utilizing Healthcare.gov, and with at least 2 additional states considering enrollment, the concept of a national healthcare insurance exchange (HIE) may quickly become a reality.
With 36 states utilizing Healthcare.gov, and with at least 2 additional states considering enrollment, the concept of a national healthcare insurance exchange (HIE) may quickly become a reality. This would be converse to the ideals behind the Affordable Care Act, which intended to have each state running its own independent HIE. Many remain worried as to whether the federal government is prepared for such an undertaking.
“We’re kind of, in a way, stumbling into this situation,” said health expert and former Deputy Secretary of HHS Tevi Troy.
The federal exchange option was originally meant to be a safety net for those states that did not build exchanges in time to meet consumer demand, but it is unlikely that many states would have predicted there would be so many challenges in establishing state-run exchanges.
“While [the administration] spent an inordinate amount of time and energy and money encouraging states to run and own their own exchanges, I think that that has kind of shifted,” said Jon Kingsdale, a consultant who worked with the original Massachusetts exchange under former Governor Mitt Romney.
Although CMS said it would continue to work with states in securing their exchanges, many have opted to use the federal exchange in order to resolve growing financial and logistical problems. This decision may eventually affect state legislators if they later change their mind.
“I think forces inside the federal government think the federal government should run this,” said Joel Ario, a consultant with Manatt Health Solutions. “I think those folks are now pushing hard, and if the states aren’t careful, there may be some … motion to make it harder for the states to reclaim their role.”
One solution may be choosing state-federal partnerships, where states could modify federal exchange offerings to suit their particular needs. Several states, including New Hampshire and Michigan, have already taken advantage of such an arrangement.
Around the Web
GOP’s Obamacare Fears Come True [Politico]
The Joint Commission is launching the Rural Health Clinic Accreditation Program to standardize staff training and patient care practices at rural health clinics nationwide; the American Cancer Society recently launched the largest-ever study of cancer risk and outcomes in Black women; the HHS COVID-19 vaccination campaign saved $732 billion by preventing illness and related costs.
Read More
CMS Medicare Final Rule: Advancing Benefits, Competition, and Consumer Protection
May 7th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with Karen Iapoce, senior director of government products and programs at ZeOmega, about the recent CMS final rule on Medicare Part D and Medicare Advantage.
Listen
Examining Low-Value Cancer Care Trends Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 25th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the April 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on the rates of low-value cancer care services throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Listen
AUA Session Highlights the General Urologist’s Role in Gender-Affirming Care
May 7th 2024During her session, Polina Reyblat, MD, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, highlighted best practices urologists should incorporate to make transgender and gender-diverse patients comfortable during physical exams and avoid retraumatization.
Read More
