In the interview “Oral vs Injectable GLP-1 Cost-Saving Strategies: Eric Levin,” published on AJMC, Eric Levin, CEO of Scripta, explained that although oral glucagon-like peptide-1s (GLP-1s) should theoretically cost less to manufacture than injectables, insurance reimbursement rates for the 2 formulations are currently comparable. He advised patients to check coverage, look into manufacturer assistance programs, and consider cash-pay options like GoodRx.
HR Executive cited AJMC’s interview to note that despite lower self-pay list prices for oral GLP-1s, reimbursement parity with injectables means employers shouldn’t assume oral formulations are automatically the cheaper path. That supports the interview’s broader argument that pharmacy benefit choices now carry stop-loss implications employers can’t ignore.