Ashok Subramanian, MBA, founder and chief executive officer, Centivo, speaks on the limitations of traditional employer-based health benefit plans in the pursuit of value-based care and what employers should consider in designing these incentives on a community level.
Ashok Subramanian, MBA, founder and chief executive officer, Centivo, speaks on the limitations of traditional employer-based health benefit plans in the pursuit of value-based care and what employers should consider in designing these incentives on a community level.
Subramanian recently participated in a panel discussion at the 2022 Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health annual conference titled, “Driving Value through Health Plan Innovation.”
Transcript
How has value-based care integration fared under traditional employer-based health benefit plans and what limitations persist through these models?
So, the challenge that value-based care models have had with traditional carriers, traditional networks, is that, in effect, most networks include every provider—it includes every provider that’s committed to value, drives affordability, is cost effective and high quality. It also includes providers that are not that are not—that are high cost or may miss the mark when it comes to quality scores.
And most benefit designs don't differentiate for the employee, whether that employee should pay more or pay less if they go to those different types of providers. So, ultimately, there's a deep frustration amongst a lot of providers who've committed to value-based care, because in their minds, they're doing the right things, they're trying to control costs, are trying to keep people out of the hospital, they're trying to improve outcomes, avoid complications, avoid recurrence, yet, they're actually paid less and they see fewer patients than they feel like they should, because there's no incentive for people to go to them, as opposed to folks across town who may not be as effective.
So, providers have really embraced new models. Ours is one of them, there's others as well. But I think for providers to get that message through, it is essential that they really understand how employees consume their health insurance, because that ultimately drives whether they're going to get that market share or not.
What factors warrant consideration by employers in designing value-based care initiatives on a community level?
I think there's 2 or 3 parts. So, most employers that we engage with are pretty clear that quality comes first. So, ultimately, employers care about cost, cost is very important, but these employees are their workers, their family members, it's become very hard to attract and retain talent given COVID-19, given some of the other pressures in the economy. And so the most important thing that employers typically look for is I want to save money, but I don't want to compromise on quality.
And so really assessing and understanding and being transparent around quality scores, things that we've talked about already, complication rates, recurrence rates, that's the starting point. The next part is once you meet that bar for quality is: are you committed to affordability? Are you cost effective in your market? Or are you simply charging more because you can, because you own the only hospital in town. Because you're the only provider of cardiac care. And those sorts of examples of market power driving cost up is something that employers are getting much more attuned to now.
And then the third thing is there is this great awakening around primary care, and the fact that the more we spend on preventing disease in the first place, the more that people have a trusted relationship with a primary care physician, a primary care team, the more that primary care is not just about a 7 minute sick visit, but it's about 30 minutes to understand the person, integrating mental health with physical health, having access 24 hours a day in different forms. Those are things that employers are looking for as well and really in our minds, is the bedrock of value-based care as it comes to serving the employer community.
Health Equity Adjustments in Medicare HVBP Program Will Benefit Safety Net Hospitals, Study Says
March 29th 2024Medicare’s upcoming health equity adjustment in the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program will reduce disproportionate penalization among safety net hospitals and those serving high proportions of Black patients, according to a recent study.
Read More
Exploring Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization Variations
March 26th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the March 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on variations in prior authorization use across Medicare Advantage plans.
Listen
Risk for Second Primary Melanoma Increases After Primary Melanoma Diagnosis as Men Age
March 28th 2024A population-based cohort study out of Norway has found that older men have a higher risk of developing second primary invasive melanoma following an initial primary melanoma, suggesting the benefits of increased surveillance in these patients.
Read More
Navigating Health Literacy, Social Determinants, and Discrimination in National Health Plans
February 13th 2024On this episode of Managed Care Cast, we're talking with the authors of a study published in the February 2024 issue of The American Journal of Managed Care® about their findings on how health plans can screen for health literacy, social determinants of health, and perceived health care discrimination.
Listen
Poor Well-Being Scores Linked to Early Treatment Stoppage in Multiple Myeloma
March 27th 2024Investigators used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General General Physical Wellbeing Scale to collect data on patient-reported treatment-related adverse effects, to provide clinicians guidance on predicting risk of early treatment discontinuation among ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 trial participants.
Read More