Who Should Receive Optimal Diabetes Care?

, , , ,
The American Journal of Managed Care, August 2007, Volume 13, Issue 8

TO THE EDITORS:

Pogach et al1 recommend against the use of glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) of less than 7% as a diabetes quality measure. Hayward's accompanying editorial labels all-or-none treatment targets bad performance measures.2 However, Minnesota's multiyear real-world experience reporting Optimal Diabetes Care, a measure that incorporates multiple all-or-none treatment thresholds, differs from these opinions.

HealthPartners, a large Minnesota health plan, publicly reports comparative provider group performance on a composite All-or-None Optimal Diabetes Care measure.3 In addition to A1C of less than 7.0%, the measure also requires a low-density

Employer Data and Information Set specifications.

Minnesota Community Measurement reports the same measure using all payer data at www.mnhealthcare.org, and Fairview University Clinics recently began reporting individual clinic Optimal Diabetes Care rates at http://www.fairview.org/patient_safety/. More than 40% of patients with diabetes cared for by Fairview's highest

President and CEO

Peoria, Illinois

George J. Isham, MD

HealthPartners

VA New Jersey Health Care System

David Aron, MDCleveland VA Medical Center

Donald R. Miller, ScDBedford VA Medical Center

Address correspondence to: Gail M. Amundson, MD, Quality Quest for Health, 100 NE Adams St, LX-7170, Peoria, IL 61629-7170. E-mail: amundson_gail@cat.com.

Address correspondence to: Leonard M. Pogach, MD, VA New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange VAMC, Rm 9-160 (111), 385 Tremont Ave, East Orange, NJ 07018. E-mail: leonard.pogach@med.va.gov.

Author Disclosure: Dr Miller reports receiving grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Sanofi-Aventis. The remaining authors (GMA, GJI, LMP, DA) report no relationship or financial interest with any entity that would pose a conflict of interest with the subject matter discussed in this manuscript.

Author Information: Concept and design (GJI, LMP, DA, DRM); acquisition of data (DRM, LMP); drafting of the manuscript (GJI, LMP, DA, DRM); analysis and interpretation of data (LMP); critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content (LMP, DA, DRM); administrative, technical, or logical support (LMP); supervision (GJI, LMP).

1. Pogach LM, Tiwari A, Maney M, Rajan M, Miller DR, Aron D. Should mitigating comorbidities be considered in assessing healthcare plan performance in achieving optimal glycemic control? Am J Manag Care. 2007;13:133-140.

3. Amundson GM, Gentilli S. HealthPartners Clinical Indicators Report. 14th ed. Bloomington, Minn: HealthPartners, Inc; 2006.

5. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Available at: www.dartmouthatlas.org. Accessed May 14, 2007.6. UnitedHealth Group State Health Rankings. Available at: http://www.unitedhealthfoundation.org/ahr2006/Findings.html#Findings. Accessed

7. O’Connor PJ, Desai J, Solberg LI, et al. Randomized trial of quality improvement intervention to improve diabetes care in primary care settings. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1890-1897.

9. Thompson W,Wang H, Xiem, et al. Assessing quality of diabetes care by measuring longitudinal changes in hemoglobin A1C in the Veterans Health Administration. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1818-1835.

11. Pogach L, Engelgau M, Aron D. Measuring progress towards achieving hemoglobin A1c goals: pass/fail or partial credit. JAMA. 2007;297:520-523.