
C-Reactive Protein May Guide HS Treatment Choices
With high biologic treatment failure rates common among patients who have hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), investigators set out to evaluate the potential of biomarkers to estimate potential treatment response.
Beyond the use of dermal tunnels and family history to estimate treatment response for
Adalimumab is the only medication currently approved by the FDA to treat hidradenitis suppurativa—it is sold as Humira by AbbVie in the US—and that approval for moderate to severe disease was handed down on September 10, 2015.2 The approval was based on data from PIONEER I (November 29, 2011-January 28, 2014) and PIONEER II (December 28, 2011-April 28, 2014) and followed a May 2015 orphan drug designation.3
Across the patient cohorts of both studies (N = 588), the mean (SD) age was 36.4 (11.2) years,
Overall, more patients included in this post hoc analysis had elevated C-reactive protein at baseline (464 vs 124 patients), which was defined in the PIONEER studies as being above 0.23 mg/dL. The median elevated level was 1.23 (0.65-2.81), and the median normal level, 0.16 (0.10-0.22).
Patients in the group with elevated C-reactive protein also had higher baseline mean BMI (34.1 [7.9] vs 28.6 [6.0] kg/mg2), more had Hurley stage III disease (51.5% vs 25.8%), median IHS4 score was more than double (25 [14-45] vs 12 [7-23]), and total number of abscesses/inflammatory nodules, abscesses alone, inflammatory nodules alone, and draining fistulas was higher (22 vs 15).
Patients were randomized to receive 40-mg weekly adalimumab or placebo for 12 weeks, at which point they were evaluated for clinical response.
The investigators saw that having baseline elevated C-reactive protein correlated with a 47% greater risk of reduced clinical response (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.83; P = .006). However, receipt of adalimumab also correlated with a greater chance of clinical response in both those with baseline elevated (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.13-4.81; P < .001) and normal C-reactive protein (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.06-4.88; P = .04). In addition, just among the patients with baseline elevated C-reactive protein, each unit increase in the protein was linked to a lesser chance of treatment response (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00; P = .04).
“Assuming linearity, the OR of clinical response for adalimumab recipients with [C-reactive protein level] of 2.81 mg/dL (third quartile of elevated [C-reactive protein]) vs 0.30 mg/dL was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.49-0.97),” the authors explained.
Because of their findings, the authors suggest that patients who have a more severe degree of inflammation may not benefit as greatly as patients who have less inflammation, and they recommend prospective research more clearly define the cutoff for someone unlikely to benefit from adalimumab.
References
1. Gunter SJ, Porter ML, Kimball AB. C-reactive protein and response to adalimumab in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. Published online January 8, 2025. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5146
2. Blaszczak A, Trinidad JCL, Cartron AM. Adalimumab for treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa during the COVID-19 pandemic: safety considerations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(1):e31. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.030
3. AbbVie's Humira (adalimumab) receives first and only U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. News release. AbbVie. September 10, 2015. Accessed January 8, 2025.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.