CMS Cracks Down on Dialysis Providers for Steering Patients to Individual Market
Since insurers began pulling out of the individual market in many states, CMS has vowed to crack down on practices that drive up costs.
CMS struck a blow Tuesday to end a practice by dialysis centers of underwriting premiums that kept patients out of Medicare or Medicaid by covering the cost of their premiums, which allowed them to collect thousands in payments from insurers on the federal exchange.
The practice, which both insurers and social workers told CMS is widespread, led to high costs for health plans who ended up covering an unexpected number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), a condition so costly—around $100,000 a year in Medicare—that patients with ESRD are extended coverage at any age.
However, with the arrival of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and its ban on barring coverage for pre-existing conditions, some dialysis centers found they could reap higher payments from insurers taking part on the exchanges if they paid patients’ premiums, either directly or through a foundation, and then billed the private insurer at higher rates than Medicare will pay. A CMS
Monday’s
A statement for the group “
“The rule singles out ESRD patients, who are eligible for Medicare at any age but who can benefit from services offered in the individual insurance market that Medicare does not cover,” the statement said. Examples cited included diabetes supplies, nutrition assistance, and care from a psychiatrist who does not accept Medicare.
However, one of the group’s
In that statement, the company said, “If CMS were to issue a broader ruling that made access to charitable premium assistance unavailable to all ESRD patients on ACA plans, the estimated financial impact would increase by up to $90 million, based on our estimate that a significant number of ESRD patients would lose their ACA coverage and end up completely uninsured, while others could continue the coverage with federal subsidies.”
In the past year, as major national insurers have pulled out of many states and left some markets with limited choices, CMS has vowed to take steps to stem losses in the individual market. Third-party payment of premiums has been cited as a huge cause for concern, with hospital foundations and other charities seeing a premium payment of a few thousand dollars as a minimum investment to ensure more substantial reimbursements for sick patients who would otherwise rely on Medicare or Medicaid. CMS issued a request for information on this issue in August 2016.
Among the problems particular to ESRD patients: those facing a transplant had to ensure continuous coverage, yet the parties paying their premium for individual policies during dialysis were unwilling to do so once this service ended. In CMS’ view, this laid bare the true purpose of their charitable offering—the patients’ needs were of no concern once the potential for reimbursement ended. According to the CMS fact sheet, social workers said some facilities aggressively steered all patients toward individual policies regardless of circumstances, including the potential for out-of-pocket costs that would not occur with Medicaid.
The rule issued Tuesday requires the following:
· Upfront disclosure for patients of coverage options, including individual market plans, Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program, and the Medicare ESRD Program.
· A summary of short-term and long-term costs of various health coverage options.
· Facilities must tell insurers of individual market plans when they make premium payments for clients.
· Facilities must gain assurance that the health plan will accept the premium payment for the entire plan year, or else they cannot make such payments.
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.
Related Articles
- Promising Early Efgartigimod Response Data for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
September 18th 2025
- Iron Dysregulation Linked to MS Progression, Review Finds
September 18th 2025
- Metabolic Issues More Common in Patients With HIV
September 18th 2025
- Barriers to Gender-Affirming Surgery Persist Despite High Satisfaction Rate
September 18th 2025