The purpose of evidence-based guidelines is to reduce the level of variation, improve outcomes, and reduce costs, said Derek Raghavan, MD, PhD, FACP, FRACP, president, Carolinas HealthCare System's Levine Cancer Institute.
The purpose of evidence-based guidelines is to reduce the level of variation, improve outcomes, and reduce costs, said Derek Raghavan, MD, PhD, FACP, FRACP, president, Carolinas HealthCare System's Levine Cancer Institute.
Transcript
With studies finding large variation and price differences in how care is delivered, what is the importance of putting in place evidence-based guidelines and ensuring they are followed?
One of the really important things about having evidence-based guidelines is, it’s stops the unnecessary variation. It basically gives what I have to describe as a “cookbook” approach to treatment. It’s predicated on level 1 evidence, which means randomized clinical trials, very carefully structured patient populations, so the stringency of assessment, the level of attention to detail of what population of patients with a set of drugs will get what results. That will reduce the level of variation that we have, and it becomes very important if you’re trying to get your arms around the cost of treatment.
If every physician wants to use every new drug, they’re almost always very expensive, you’ll have wide levels of variation of outcome, side effects, and cost. Increasingly, we move to the value proposition: what is the outcome for the unit cost? So, developing guidelines, that are predicated on expert opinions—so, you have a bunch of experts getting together and agreeing that their guidelines will be based on level 1 evidence from randomized trials or very well-structured trials. What’s happened in the past is, patterns of practice are sometimes from a bunch of good ol’ boys who get together and say, “I do this, what do you do? Oh, you do the same thing. Well, let’s say that’s the way to do it.” Now, we’re actually looking at the domain of evidence that’s out there, that’s published, that’s been peer-reviewed, and that’s true, and we then take into account the level of genetic variation, the level of population variation.
The Lancet Oncology commission recently published a statement that I think was terribly important: If every patient with cancer in the United States was able to have the results achieved by a college-educated white male, the death rate by cancer would drop by 25%. That’s a tremendously important statement. What it says is that in United States—and this actually isn’t restricted just to the United States—the people who have educated and resources get better results than the people who don’t. If you look in the field of disparities of care there are some less-educated African Americans and Hispanics, there are people that don’t speak the language from other groups, the elderly, the isolated poor, poverty itself will impede the ability to get great results. We’ve published data to show that patients on Medicaid and Medicare have worse results than people with private insurance.
By developing guidelines that take into account the variation of the populations that we’re treating, we should be able to improve the cancer treatment results in terms of cure rates and length of remissions, reduce the side effects, and, importantly, bring down the costs. If the medical profession doesn’t do this and doesn’t take leadership, then government functionaries will do it, and it will be predicated on misunderstanding of very complex data. So, we have to get this right and we have to do it as a profession.
Refining Precision Prevention for Benign Breast Disease
December 7th 2023Many questions remain surrounding accurately classifying the risk of developing invasive breast cancer associated with the benign breast disease diagnoses of nonproliferative lesions and proliferative changes without atypia.
Read More
The Importance of Examining and Preventing Atrial Fibrillation
August 29th 2023At this year’s American Society for Preventive Cardiology Congress on CVD Prevention, Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM, delivered the Honorary Fellow Award Lecture, “The Imperative to Focus on the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation,” as the recipient of this year’s Honorary Fellow of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology award.
Listen
ASH 2023 to Highlight Options in Care for Blood Diseases—for Those Who Have Access
December 7th 2023The 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition, which runs Friday through Tuesday in the San Diego Convention Center, will showcase the growing number of treatment choices in blood cancers and disorders.
Read More
Race/Ethnicity May Influence Local Recurrence in DCIS, Adjuvant Treatment
December 6th 2023Disparities in 10-year local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery were seen among women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated over a nearly 4-decade span at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, with Black women having the highest rate.
Read More
SDOH in Cancer Care Highlight Multifactorial Equity Issues
December 6th 2023A trio of speakers addressed the importance of social determinants of health (SDOH) in cancer care on day 1 of the 46th annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in the session, “Social Determinants of Health: Impact on Cancer Care.”
Read More