Randall A. Oyer, MD, medical director, oncology, and medical director, Cancer Risk Evaluation Program, Lancaster General Health, and clinical professor of cancer biology at Penn Medicine, discusses the recent American Society of Clinical Oncology/Association of Community Cancer Centers recommendations for improving diversity in clinical trials.
The theme for this year’s American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting is "Advancing Equitable Cancer Care Through Innovation," and in this interview, Randall A. Oyer, MD, medical director, oncology, and medical director, Cancer Risk Evaluation Program, Lancaster General Health, and clinical professor of cancer biology at Penn Medicine, discusses the recent ASCO/Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) recommendations for improving diversity in clinical trials.
Oyer is lead author on the paper, “Increasing Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Cancer Clinical Trials: American Society of Clinical Oncology/Association of Community Cancer Centers Joint Research Statement,” published recently in Journal of Clinical Oncology. He is also past president of ACCC.
Have you noticed changes even ahead of these recommendations?
In April, the FDA issued draft guidance for industry that a race and ethnicity diversity plan is recommended for all medical products for which an IND [investigational new drug] submission is required and for clinical studies that support a marketing submission. Sponsors are given guidance to discuss a race and ethnicity diversity plan with the FDA as soon as practical in the process and at any interval along the way. Sponsors are also asked to define enrollment goals and methods that they will use as part of a trial to make sure that the diversity goals are met.
Additionally, the American Cancer Society, NCCN [National Comprehensive Cancer Network], and the National Minority Quality Forum recently joined forces to create an institutional and practice equity report card that calls out the need to offer clinical trials to all cancer patients and calls out that staff training is needed to reduce barriers. And then ASCO and Friends of Cancer Research have also issued a joint statement to broaden clinical trials eligibility. It’s already happening; the awareness is here. And it is really a top agenda item for every cancer organization to increase diversity and make equity a real cornerstone of what we do in cancer medicine.
We’re not going to be where we want to be in cancer care, nor where we know we can be in cancer care, without improving on clinical trials, and improving on clinical trials means that they’re accessible to everyone.
What is the role of community oncology practices in promoting greater diversity in clinical trials?
In the US, most cancer patients receive their care in the community setting rather than in the academic medical center, which means that clinical trials need to be brought directly to the communities where patients are receiving their care. Yet 75% of the problem with patients not being offered clinical trials is because a matching clinical trial is not available where a patient is being treated.
Community practices now understand that cancer treatment trials are a component of high-quality care, and we see community practices investing in people, systems, and training, to work with an academic partner, to work with industry, or to be part of a cooperative group that can make relevant trials accessible to patients in their communities. ACCC and ASCO are also recommending forming solid partnerships in every community: with patients, patient advisory groups, and with community organizations and leaders.
What role do payers specifically play in bringing greater diversity to the research process?
Well, payers can and must allow their customers and beneficiaries to participate in clinical trials. They must cover trial expenses to the same extent that they cover standard of care. No policy should exclude clinical trials.
Is there a specific role for CMS in this process?
CMS can make clinical trial participation, I believe, one of the quality metrics that they follow, measure, report on, and value through an advanced payment model. It has been a quality component of the Oncology Care Model, the now 6-year pilot project that’s just coming to a close.