EHR Makers Surprised by Stage 2 Complexity
As the end of 2013 closes in, most federal certification bodies are noticing an uptick in the number of vendors who are applying to become certified under the 2014 criteria - the same criteria that will be required for the EHR products providers must use to attest to meaningful use Stage 2.
As the end of 2013 closes in, most federal certification bodies are noticing an uptick in the number of vendors who are applying to become certified under the 2014 criteria — the same criteria that will be required for the EHR products providers must use to attest to meaningful use Stage 2.
“It has been a slow start. They’re working hard. They’re struggling a little bit, said Alisa Ray, executive director and CEO of the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology, CCHIT, adding that when comparing Stage 1 to Stage 2 certification, vendors are “navigating a higher bar and increased complexity.”
Ray said there are three areas of Stage 2 that are proving the most challenging for certification: clinical quality measures, interoperability, and automated measure calculation for reporting metrics.
Read the full story here:
Source: Government Health IT
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.
Related Articles
- AML Survival After 3 Years in Remission Comparable With General Population
September 20th 2025
- AHA Launches New Initiative to Help Patients With Heart Failure
September 20th 2025
- CSU More Burdensome in Female Patients, Especially in Midlife
September 20th 2025
- Pirtobrutinib Shows Clinically Meaningful PFS Improvement in Frontline CLL
September 19th 2025
- Rocatinlimab AD Combo Therapy Safe, Effective Over 24 Weeks
September 19th 2025