
Feature|Articles|July 14, 2026
Medicaid Fraud Crackdown Intensifies, But Is It Solving the Right Problem?
Author(s)Pearl Steinzor
Fact checked by: Maggie L. Shaw
CMS's enforcement surge has put every Medicaid Fraud Control Unit under review, but experts say the bigger driver of coverage loss may be red tape.
Advertisement
Advertisement
In January 2026, Minnesota received a letter from CMS announcing it would begin withholding $515 million in quarterly federal Medicaid payments, citing unresolved program integrity concerns.1 The state sued. A federal court dismissed the case on procedural grounds in April, and even after CMS accepted Minnesota's corrective action plan the following month, the withheld funds were not released.2 By May, CMS had gone further still, deferring $1.3 billion in federal Medicaid funding to the state—the largest deferral action in the agency's history.3
Related to this article

Early modeling put sickle cell gene therapy coverage near 11 cents per member per month.

PBM reform, Medicare Advantage exits, and the 340B rebate pilot are reshaping drug access. Here is what payers need to know heading into 2027.

HHS does not intend to take enforcement action against pharmacies compounding BPC-157 and 5 other unapproved peptides if they meet 10 conditions.

Bipolar disorder often goes undiagnosed for years, and clinicians need to separate mood episodes from normal emotions and keep patients on treatment.

Initial frontal fibrosing alopecia treatment was largely similar in Black and White patients, though tetracycline use was higher in Black patients.

HHS enforcement discretion lets state pharmacies compound BPC-157 and other peptides amid rulemaking and legal challenges.

Cost and access, not side effects, drive GLP-1 discontinuation, and obesity should be covered like diabetes, says Fatima Cody Stanford, MD.
Advertisement
Advertisement

