National survey reveals primary care physicians have low knowledge of consumer-directed health plans and limited readiness to engage patients on issues of cost and quality.
Objective: To evaluate physiciansâ€™ readiness to care for patients enrolled in consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs), which change the nature of cost sharing and medical decision making in primary care.
Study Design: Mailed cross-sectional survey of 1500 nationally representative primary care physicians.
: Physiciansâ€™ knowledge of CDHP benefit design, readiness to advise patients about financial issues, and views regarding the role of quality-of-care information in patient decision making were assessed. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate models.
Results: Five hundred twenty-eight of 1076 eligible physicians (49%) responded to the survey. Forty percent of physicians had CDHP enrollees in their practices. Forty-three percent of physicians reported low knowledge of CDHP cost sharing, and approximately one-third reported low knowledge of how medical savings accounts function. Overall, physicians with CDHP enrollees in their practices had higher knowledge than physicians without these patients; however, 1 in 4 of these providers reported low knowledge of CDHP cost sharing. More than two-thirds of all physicians were ready to advise patients on the costs of office visits, medications, and laboratory tests; approximately half or less were ready to advise on the costs of radiologic studies, specialist visits, and hospitalizations. Forty-eight percent were ready to discuss medical budgets with patients. Twenty-one percent of physicians thought that patients could trust quality-of-care information from government Web sites, and 8% thought that patients could trust quality-of-care information from insurance Web sites.
Conclusion: Many primary care physicians report low knowledge of CDHPs, limited readiness to advise patients on issues of cost and medical budgeting, and minimal trust in quality-of-care information.
(Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(10):661-668)
Many primary care physicians have low knowledge and limited practice readiness with regard to consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs).
Consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs) present new challenges to the medical decision making of patients and physicians. Broadly conceived, CDHPs are composed of highdeductible insurance products and medical savings accounts (whether in the form of health savings accounts or health reimbursement arrangements). In theory, high deductibles create incentives to limit unnecessary care and to shop for services based on cost and quality. Medical savings accounts enable patients or their employers to save pretax dollars for future healthcare needs. With these reforms, CDHP enrollment has grown 10-fold in the past 3 years from 440,000 to 4.5 million, and 20% of employers, large and small, offer these plans.1
Early research indicates that CDHP enrollees utilize healthcare differently than patients in traditional plans.2 In some cases, they use fewer inappropriate services (ie, emergency department care for nonemergent conditions),3 while other studies4,5 demonstrate poorer adherence with follow-up care and physician-prescribed treatment regimens. When preventive services are exempt from the deductible, screening rates for breast and cervical cancer do not change.6 Such mixed effects may reflect the complexity of weighing the costs and benefits of medical care and of integrating various sources of clinical, financial, and quality-ofcare data.
As an initial point of contact for patients, primary care physicians are likely to confront these issues when discussing, recommending, and providing medical care. Moreover, many primary care services (including chronic disease visits, prescription medications, diagnostic testing, and, in some cases, preventive care7) are not exempt from the high deductibles. As a result, patients in CDHPs face financial considerations beyond copayments and coinsurance in deciding whether to use medical services. While CDHP enrollees may increasingly utilize Web-based clinical and decision-making supports,2 physicians may need to help patients interpret the information from these sources. Despite these challenges, research (to our knowledge) has yet to explore primary care physicians’ readiness to practice in a consumerdriven environment. For this study, we surveyed a national sample of primary care physicians to assess their knowledge and attitudes with regard to CDHP benefit design and their readiness to engage patients on issues of cost and quality. Along with analyzing the sample as a whole, we tested whether outcomes differed between physicians with and without CDHP enrollees in their practices.
Study Design and Population
We developed the survey instrument after a literature review of CDHPs, patient cost sharing, and primary care decision making and pilot tested it among 50 academic and community-based primary care physicians. The final survey instrument included a clinical vignette and a questionnaire about knowledge and attitudes related to CDHPs. This study focuses on results from the questionnaire. The full survey is shown in the (available at www.ajmc.com). The institutional review board of the University of Pennsylvania approved this study.
The questionnaire first asked physicians about their baseline knowledge and overall impression of CDHPs. It then provided a brief description of the plans’ deductible requirements and medical savings account options. Next, physicians were asked about (1) their general readiness to discuss issues of cost, cost-effectiveness, and medical budgeting with patients; (2) their ability to advise patients on the costs of commonly prescribed services; (3) their views regarding the effects of CDHPs on clinical care; and (4) their views on the role of publicly available quality-of-care information in patient decision making. Questions were answered on a 5-point scale. In the demographics section, we asked physicians whether any of their patients were enrolled in CDHPs and, if so, what percentage of their practice panel. We did not ask specifically whether physicians were aware of CDHP insurance status at the time of care.
Of the 1500 total sample, 528 eligible physicians responded to the survey (). After excluding 124 physicians who did not practice primary care and 300 physicians with undeliverable or inaccurate mailing addresses, the adjusted response rate was 49% (528 of 1076). Respondents were more likely than nonrespondents to be female (32% vs 27%, P = .04), board certified (86% vs 81%, P = .02), and family physicians or general practitioners (58% vs 49%, P = .002). There were no significant differences between respondents and nonrespondents with regard to age or region.
Experience With CDHPs
In response to the question “Prior to this study, how much had you heard about consumer-directed health plans (CDHPs)?,” 43% reported having heard “a little” or “not at all,” 33% reported having heard “somewhat,” and 24% reported having heard “much” or “a great deal” (). Similarly, 43% indicated low knowledge of out-of-pocket costs faced by CDHP enrollees. Last, approximately one-third had low knowledge of how money is contributed to (35%) and spent from (31%) medical savings accounts.
Impression of CDHPs
Next, we asked physicians “how ready” they were to discuss issues related to cost, cost-effectiveness, and budgeting. While almost three-quarters of physicians were ready to discuss issues of cost and cost-effectiveness, less than half were ready to discuss medical budgeting with patients (). Physicians with CDHP enrollees in their practices were more ready than those without CDHP enrollees to discuss the 3 topics of costs of medical care (AOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.48-3.68), costeffectiveness of medical care (AOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.33-3.41), and medical budgeting (AOR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.35-2.92).
Turning to the costs of specific services, we asked physicians whether they were ready to advise patients on costs taking into account the resources at their practice sites. More than two-thirds of physicians were ready in the case of office visits, medications, and laboratory testing. However, approximately half or less were ready to advise patients on the costs of radiologic studies, specialist consultation, and hospitalizations. Compared with physicians without CDHP enrollees in their practices, physicians with these patients were more ready to discuss the costs of medications (AOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.03-2.71) but were no more ready to discuss the costs of the other 5 services.
Role of Quality-of-Care Information in Patient Decision Making
In addition to considering costs, patients in CDHPs are encouraged to use information on quality-of-care when making medical decisions. Less than half of physicians in our survey agreed that quality-of-care information from government or insurance Web sites should factor into patients’ choice of hospitals or specialists (Table 3). Having CDHP enrollees in one’s practice was not associated with attitudes regarding the use of quality-ofcare information. Less than one-quarter of physicians agreed with the statement that “Patients can generally trust the quality information provided by government websites.” Only 8% agreed that patients can trust quality-of-care information from insurer Web sites. Again, physicians with CDHP enrollees in their practices were no more or less likely to trust these sources of information.
Anticipated Effects on Healthcare Utilization
Through a national survey, we assessed primary care physicians’ readiness to care for patients enrolled in CDHPs. First, many physicians, including those with CDHP enrollees in their practices, have low knowledge of cost-sharing requirements and of medical savings accounts. Second, while physicians are generally ready to discuss issues of cost with patients, they are less ready to discuss medical budgeting and to advise patients on the costs of specific services. Third, primary care physicians do not generally trust the quality-of-care information that patients in CDHPs may increasingly utilize.
Some may consider that physicians’
2. Buntin MB, Damberg C, Haviland A, et al. Consumer-directed health plans: early evidence about effects on cost and quality. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(6):w516-w530.
4. Davis K, Doty MM, Ho A. How High Is Too High? Implications of High-Deductible Health Plans. New York, NY: Commonwealth Fund; April 2005.
6. Rowe JW, Brown-Stevenson T, Downey RL, Newhouse JP. The effect of consumer-directed health plans on the use of preventive and chronic illness services. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(1):113-120.
8. US Department of the Treasury. Dramatic Growth of Health Savings Accounts. Washington, DC: US Dept of the Treasury; December 12, 2006.
10. Bloche MG. Consumer-directed health care and disadvantage. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(5):1315-1327.
12. Tynan A, Christianson JB. Consumer-Directed Health Plans: Mixed Employer Signals, Complex Market Dynamics. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change; March 2008. Issue brief 119.
14. Fronstin P, Collins SR. 2007 EBRI/Commonwealth Fund Consumerism in Health Survey. Washington, DC: Employee Benefit Research Institute; March 2008. EBRI issue brief 315.
health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(4):293-300.
17. Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Tseng CW, McFadden D, Meltzer DO. Barriers to patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(8):856-860.
19. Hartz AJ, Pulido JS, Kuhn EM. Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys? Am J Public Health. 1997;87(10):1645-1648.
21. Ginsburg M. Rearranging the deck chairs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(6):w537-w539.
23. Jacobson PD, Tunick MR. Consumer-directed health care and the courts: let the buyer (and seller) beware. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(3):704-714.
25. Rosenthal M, Hsuan C, Milstein A. A report card on the freshman class of consumer-directed health plans. Health Aff (Millwood).2005;24(6):1592-1600.