
Opinion|Videos|January 30, 2025
Oral vs IV Iron in Clinical Practice
Panelists discuss how oral iron therapy, although convenient and cost-effective, has significant limitations, including gastrointestinal adverse effects and poor absorption, leading many patients to experience iron intolerance or inadequate response, which often necessitates switching to intravenous iron administration for more reliable and rapid repletion of iron stores.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Video content above is prompted by the following:
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of oral versus intravenous (IV) iron therapy in the treatment of IDA?
- Please define oral iron intolerance. What are the potential reasons and subsequent steps for patients with IDA who have had an unsatisfactory response to oral iron therapy?
Newsletter
Stay ahead of policy, cost, and value—subscribe to AJMC for expert insights at the intersection of clinical care and health economics.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on AJMC
1
J&J Agreement Brings 15 of 17 Pharma Companies Into Trump's Drug-Pricing Effort
2
Insights Into Patient Portal Engagement Leveraging Observational Electronic Health Data
3
Postpandemic Nursing Home Capacity Declines Tied to Longer Hospital Stays, Increased Patient Travel
4
Early Data Show Promising Outcomes as CAR T-Cell Therapy Expands Beyond Academic Centers
5




























































