A new dose-finding study found a twice-daily 200 mg dose of the JAK2/IRAK1 inhibitor pacrinitib led to a spleen volume response in nearly 1 in 10 patients.
A new study suggests a dose of 200 mg of pacritinib taken twice daily is safe and demonstrates clinical activity in patients with advanced myelofibrosis.
The results of the dose-finding study, published in Blood Advances, helped investigators settle on the appropriate dose for the pivotal phase 3 study.
Pacritinib is a novel therapy that inhibits both Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) and is aimed at patients who are unable to take ruxolitinib (Jakafi). In 2 earlier phase 3 studies (PERSIST-1 and PERSIST-2), the medication showed clinically meaningful spleen volume responses (SVRs), and appeared to have the potential to be effective even in patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelet counts above 50 x 103/μL). That’s important because the 2 JAK inhibitors currently on the United States market to treat myelofibrosis have not yet been studied in patients who present with severe thrombocytopenia, wrote corresponding author Aaron T. Gerds, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Ins
Though the PERSIST studies showed promising results, they also raised concerns due to high-grade cardiac and bleeding events observed in some study enrollees. As a result, the investigators constructed the new study, dubbed PAC203, as a phase 2 study to ascertain a recommended dosage for phase 3 study.
In PAC203, 161 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dosage cohorts: 1 group received pacritinib at a dosage of 100 mg once per day; the second group received 100 mg twice daily; the last group received 200 mg twice per day.
Each of the patients enrolled in the study had advanced myelofibrosis and was intolerant of (73%) or resistant to (76%) ruxolitinib. Half of the patients met the criteria for both intolerance and resistance. Forty-four percent of patients had severe thrombocytopenia.
The two metrics chosen to gauge efficacy were 35% or greater SVR, and 50% or greater reduction in the disease’s 7-component total symptom score (TSS) at 24 weeks.
In terms of SVR, 9.3% of patients in the 200 mg/twice daily group met the benchmark response, compared to just 1.8% in the 100 mg/twice daily group and 0% in the 100 mg once-daily group. The median reduction of -10.1% was also greatest in that group.
In terms of TSS, overall rates were similar across all 3 groups, ranging from 7.3% to 7.7%. However, the percent reduction varied across groups, with the highest median reduction in the 200 mg/twice daily group (-27%, versus -16% and -3% in the 100 mg/twice daily and 100 mg/once daily groups, respectively).
Notably, while gastrointestinal adverse events, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were the most common adverse events, there was no excess of grade 3 or higher hemorrhagic or cardiac events in the highest-dose group. The authors said those data suggest the study’s risk minimization measures were successful. Those measures will be carried forward in the phase 3 study, which is ongoing and has been named PACIFICA. That study will compare 200 mg/twice daily of pacritinib with physician’s choice therapy in patients with myelofibrosis and severe thrombocytolpenia.
As that study continues, Gerds and colleagues said the existing data leaves room for optimism.
“Pacritinib remains the only prospectively evaluated therapy supported by clinical data for treating patients with myelofibrosis and severe thrombocytopenia, an area of unmet need and the focus of the current phase 3 trial,” they concluded.
Reference
Gerds AT, Savona MR, Scott BL, et al. Determining the recommended dose of pacritinib: results from the PAC203 dose-finding trial in advanced myelofibrosis. Blood Adv. 2020;4(22):5825-5835. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003314
NCCN Guidelines Update Adds Momelotinib Below Ruxolitinib for High-, Low-Risk Myelofibrosis
January 23rd 2024Momelotinib was given category 2A and 2B status for patients with high- and low-risk myelofibrosis (MF) and MF with anemia. However, ruxolitinib retains a higher category of recommendation as a treatment for patients with MF.
Read More
Oncology Onward: A Conversation With Dr Shereef Elnahal, Under Secretary for Health
April 20th 2023Shereef Elnahal, MD, MBA, under secretary for health at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), sat for a conversation with our hosts Emeline Aviki, MD, MBA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Stephen Schleicher, MD, MBA, Tennessee Oncology, that covered the cancer footprint of the VHA.
Listen
Interventions Needed to Increase DMT Uptake in Sickle Cell Disease
December 26th 2023A recent study found that uptake of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has been low among patients with sickle cell disease, suggesting that more interventions that consider individual patient characteristics are needed to improve adoption.
Read More
Exploring Payer Coverage Decisions Following FDA Novel Drug Approvals
May 3rd 2022On this episode of Managed Care Cast, Ari D. Panzer, BS, lead author and researcher, then at Tufts Medical Center—now at Duke University—discusses the findings from his team’s investigation into coverage decisions by health plan insurers of the 66 drugs approved by the FDA in 2018.
Listen
Exagamglogene Autotemcel Meets End Points in Severe Sickle Cell Disease, β-Thalassemia
December 7th 2023Two posters set to be presented at the 65th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting & Exposition met their primary and secondary end points regarding exagamglogene autotemcel therapy for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia.
Read More