The hypothetical risk of illness is enough of a motivating factor for people to take action, according to a study published in the Journal of Health and Social Behavior.
The hypothetical risk of illness is enough of a motivating factor for people to take action, according to a study published in the Journal of Health and Social Behavior.
Co-authors Rene Almeling, assistant professor of sociology at Yale University, and Shana Kushner Gadarian, assistant professor of political science at Syracuse University, asked participants to imagine they faced a genetic risk for a disease and assessed who wanted to take what kind of actions in response.
“Medical sociologists contend that we are living in an era of surveillance medicine, in which the emphasis on risk blurs the lines between health and disease,” the authors contended.
Participants were randomly assigned a level of risk and a disease: heart disease, colon cancer, or Alzheimer’s disease. The authors found that as the level of risk increased from 20% to 80%, people were more likely to want to take action of all kinds, including seeking information about the disease, taking medications or undergoing surgery to manage the risk, and organizing finances.
“Social scientists have argued that we are now treating risk as if it were a disease, and these results provide strong evidence for that claim,” Dr Almeling said in a statement.
The researchers also asked the participants if they have a family member or close friend with their assigned disease, and were surprised to discover personal experience with the disease did not make a difference. According to the research, people responded to the hypothetical risk of disease by wanting to take action regardless of whether or not they have seen the disease up close.
“It is extremely important for social scientists and clinicians to understand how people respond to these risk numbers and how they are being used to make important life decisions,” Dr Almeling said. She added, “Studies like this can aid healthcare providers in offering genetic information with sufficient context to insure that people make the best decisions for themselves.”
According to the researchers, the across-the-board desire to take action in response to hypothetical risk information suggests that everyone is a “patient-in-waiting.”
Empowering Community Health Through Wellness and Faith
April 23rd 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. In the third episode, Camille Clarke-Smith, EdD, MS, CHES, CPT, discusses approaching community health holistically through spiritual and community engagement.
Listen
Data Back Neoadjuvant Combo vs Chemo Alone for Early-Stage NSCLC
April 24th 2024For patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combining neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy improves 2-year outcomes over chemotherapy alone, suggest findings of an extensive literature review and meta-analysis.
Read More
Overcoming Employment Barriers for Lasting Social Impact: Freedom House 2.0 and Pathways to Work
April 16th 2024To help celebrate and recognize National Minority Health Month, we are bringing you a special month-long podcast series with our Strategic Alliance Partner, UPMC Health Plan. Welcome to our second episode, in which we learn all about Freedom House 2.0 and the Pathways to Work program.
Listen
Patient Navigation in Oncology at Heart of Priority Health White House Visit
April 24th 2024On March 27, Priority Health's president and CEO, Praveen Thadani participated in a discussion on how to expand and optimize patient navigation services in oncology care, as part of the Cancer Moonshot initiative.
Read More